codeimage.dev vs ray.so
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| codeimage.dev | ray.so | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 8.3K | 109.5K | ray.so |
| Bounce Rate | 39.9% | 37.6% | ray.so |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 4y 7m | — |
ray.so leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while codeimage.dev leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| codeimage.dev | ray.so | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 8.3K | 109.5K | ray.so |
| MoM Change | +20% | -10% | codeimage.dev |
| Avg. Session | 2m24s | 1m07s | codeimage.dev |
| Pages / Visit | 2.0 | 13.4 | ray.so |
Growth Momentum · Insight
ray.so is losing traffic (-10%) despite 109.5K monthly visits. codeimage.dev's +20% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| codeimage.dev | ray.so | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 82% | Direct 62% | |
| Bounce Rate | 39.9% | 37.6% | ray.so |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 28%
| Keyword | Volume | codeimage.dev | ray.so |
|---|---|---|---|
| code screenshot | 1.1K | #4 | #2 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
codeimage.dev acquires users primarily through Direct (82%), while ray.so relies on Direct (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — codeimage.dev's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ray.so's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| codeimage.dev | ray.so | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 4y 7m | — | |
| Registered | Feb 2022 | — | |
| Expires | Feb 2027 | — |
Market Position
| codeimage.dev | ray.so | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #2.6M | #177.6K | ray.so |
| Category Rank | #34.2K | #509 | ray.so |
codeimage.dev only
ray.so only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: codeimage.dev could expand into Brazil, Vietnam, while ray.so could target Slovakia, France.
Key Takeaways
- •ray.so is losing traffic (-10%) despite 109.5K monthly visits. codeimage.dev's +20% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •codeimage.dev acquires users primarily through Direct (82%), while ray.so relies on Direct (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — codeimage.dev's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ray.so's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •ray.so receives 13.2x more monthly traffic than codeimage.dev (109.5K vs 8.3K).
- •codeimage.dev is growing (+20%) while ray.so is declining (-10%).
- •codeimage.dev keeps visitors significantly longer (2m24s avg session vs ray.so's 1m07s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 13 keywords (28% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026