crates.app vs crates.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| crates.app | crates.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 7.6K | 668.8K | crates.io |
| Bounce Rate | 35.0% | 44.4% | crates.app |
| SEO & Keywords | 20 | 30 | crates.io |
| Domain Age | 6y 11m | 12y 7m | crates.io |
crates.io leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while crates.app leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| crates.app | crates.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 7.6K | 668.8K | crates.io |
| MoM Change | -23% | +6% | crates.io |
| Avg. Session | 0m09s | 1m23s | crates.io |
| Pages / Visit | 1.9 | 2.5 | crates.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
crates.app is losing traffic (-23%) despite 7.6K monthly visits. crates.io's +6% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| crates.app | crates.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | — | Direct 44% | |
| Bounce Rate | 35.0% | 44.4% | crates.app |
| SEO & Keywords | 20 | 30 | crates.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 11%
Business Maturity
| crates.app | crates.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 6y 11m | 12y 7m | crates.io |
| Registered | Sep 2019 | Jan 2014 | |
| Expires | Sep 2026 | Jan 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
crates.io has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| crates.app | crates.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #2.7M | #82.1K | crates.io |
| Category Rank | — | #1.7K | |
| PH Upvotes | 162 | 115 | crates.app |
crates.app only
crates.io only
Market Position · Insight
crates.app is heavily concentrated in United States (45%), creating dependency risk on a single market. crates.io has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: crates.app could expand into China, Germany, Vietnam, while crates.io could target United Kingdom, Denmark, France.
Key Takeaways
- •crates.app is losing traffic (-23%) despite 7.6K monthly visits. crates.io's +6% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •crates.io receives 87.5x more monthly traffic than crates.app (668.8K vs 7.6K).
- •crates.io is growing (+6%) while crates.app is declining (-23%).
- •crates.io keeps visitors significantly longer (1m23s avg session vs crates.app's 0m09s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •crates.app has a 9 percentage point lower bounce rate (35% vs 44%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 5 keywords (11% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026