crates.io vs docs.rs
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| crates.io | docs.rs | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 668.8K | 838.8K | docs.rs |
| Bounce Rate | 44.4% | 47.8% | crates.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 12y 7m | — |
crates.io leads in 1 of 3 dimensions, while docs.rs leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| crates.io | docs.rs | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 668.8K | 838.8K | docs.rs |
| MoM Change | +6% | +3% | crates.io |
| Avg. Session | 1m23s | 2m25s | docs.rs |
| Pages / Visit | 2.5 | 3.1 | docs.rs |
Growth Momentum · Insight
docs.rs receives 1.3x more monthly traffic than crates.io (838.8K vs 668.8K).
Acquisition Strategy
| crates.io | docs.rs | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 44% | Search 61% | |
| Bounce Rate | 44.4% | 47.8% | crates.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 15%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
crates.io acquires users primarily through Direct (44%), while docs.rs relies on Search (61%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — crates.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while docs.rs's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| crates.io | docs.rs | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 12y 7m | — | |
| Registered | Jan 2014 | — | |
| Expires | Jan 2027 | — |
Market Position
| crates.io | docs.rs | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #82.1K | #62.4K | docs.rs |
| Category Rank | #1.7K | #1.2K | docs.rs |
| PH Upvotes | 115 | — |
crates.io only
docs.rs only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: crates.io could expand into Austria, while docs.rs could target India.
Key Takeaways
- •docs.rs receives 1.3x more monthly traffic than crates.io (838.8K vs 668.8K).
- •crates.io acquires users primarily through Direct (44%), while docs.rs relies on Search (61%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — crates.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while docs.rs's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •docs.rs has 1.3x more traffic (838.8K vs 668.8K), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •docs.rs keeps visitors significantly longer (2m25s avg session vs crates.io's 1m23s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •crates.io acquires traffic primarily through Direct (44%), while docs.rs relies on Search (61%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 8 keywords (15% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026