earthquaketoday.net vs iris.edu
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| earthquaketoday.net | iris.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 16.5K | 388.7K | iris.edu |
| Bounce Rate | 67.1% | 48.7% | iris.edu |
| SEO & Keywords | 20 | 30 | iris.edu |
| Domain Age | 9m | — |
iris.edu leads in 3 of 3 dimensions, while earthquaketoday.net leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| earthquaketoday.net | iris.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 16.5K | 388.7K | iris.edu |
| MoM Change | +28% | -12% | earthquaketoday.net |
| Avg. Session | 1m12s | 0m58s | earthquaketoday.net |
| Pages / Visit | 1.7 | 5.3 | iris.edu |
Growth Momentum · Insight
iris.edu is losing traffic (-12%) despite 388.7K monthly visits. earthquaketoday.net's +28% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| earthquaketoday.net | iris.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 71% | Search 38% | |
| Bounce Rate | 67.1% | 48.7% | iris.edu |
| SEO & Keywords | 20 | 30 | iris.edu |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 16%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
earthquaketoday.net acquires users primarily through Search (71%), while iris.edu relies on Search (38%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — iris.edu's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while earthquaketoday.net's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| earthquaketoday.net | iris.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 9m | — | |
| Registered | Dec 2025 | — | |
| Expires | Dec 2026 | — |
Market Position
| earthquaketoday.net | iris.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #1.6M | #100.1K | iris.edu |
| Category Rank | — | #4 | |
| PH Upvotes | 4 | — |
iris.edu only
Market Position · Insight
earthquaketoday.net is heavily concentrated in United States (100%), creating dependency risk on a single market. iris.edu has a more diversified audience.
Key Takeaways
- •iris.edu is losing traffic (-12%) despite 388.7K monthly visits. earthquaketoday.net's +28% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •earthquaketoday.net acquires users primarily through Search (71%), while iris.edu relies on Search (38%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — iris.edu's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while earthquaketoday.net's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •iris.edu receives 23.5x more monthly traffic than earthquaketoday.net (388.7K vs 16.5K).
- •earthquaketoday.net is growing (+28%) while iris.edu is declining (-12%).
- •iris.edu has a 18 percentage point lower bounce rate (49% vs 67%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 7 keywords (16% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026