earthsky.org vs utctime.net
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| earthsky.org | utctime.net | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 710.2K | 869.9K | utctime.net |
| Bounce Rate | 57.5% | 58.6% | earthsky.org |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 26y 1m | 10y 4m | earthsky.org |
earthsky.org leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while utctime.net leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| earthsky.org | utctime.net | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 710.2K | 869.9K | utctime.net |
| MoM Change | -15% | +2% | utctime.net |
| Avg. Session | 0m38s | 0m35s | earthsky.org |
| Pages / Visit | 1.6 | 1.5 | earthsky.org |
Growth Momentum · Insight
earthsky.org is losing traffic (-15%) despite 710.2K monthly visits. utctime.net's +2% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| earthsky.org | utctime.net | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 46% | Search 84% | |
| Bounce Rate | 57.5% | 58.6% | earthsky.org |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 94%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
earthsky.org acquires users primarily through Direct (46%), while utctime.net relies on Search (84%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — earthsky.org's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while utctime.net's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| earthsky.org | utctime.net | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 26y 1m | 10y 4m | earthsky.org |
| Registered | Jul 2000 | Apr 2016 | |
| Expires | Jul 2029 | Apr 2033 |
Business Maturity · Insight
earthsky.org has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| earthsky.org | utctime.net | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #91.5K | #79.1K | utctime.net |
| Category Rank | #15 | #1.2K | earthsky.org |
earthsky.org only
utctime.net only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: earthsky.org could expand into Germany, Russia, while utctime.net could target United Kingdom, Australia.
Key Takeaways
- •earthsky.org is losing traffic (-15%) despite 710.2K monthly visits. utctime.net's +2% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •earthsky.org acquires users primarily through Direct (46%), while utctime.net relies on Search (84%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — earthsky.org's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while utctime.net's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •utctime.net has 1.2x more traffic (869.9K vs 710.2K), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •utctime.net is growing (+2%) while earthsky.org is declining (-15%).
- •earthsky.org acquires traffic primarily through Direct (46%), while utctime.net relies on Search (84%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 29 keywords (94% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026