eater.com vs opentable.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| eater.com | opentable.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 7.7M | 45.2M | opentable.com |
| Bounce Rate | 54.7% | 35.7% | opentable.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | opentable.com |
| Domain Age | 25y 9m | 27y 7m | opentable.com |
opentable.com leads in 4 of 4 dimensions, while eater.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| eater.com | opentable.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 7.7M | 45.2M | opentable.com |
| MoM Change | +2% | +1% | eater.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m25s | 2m51s | opentable.com |
| Pages / Visit | 1.8 | 3.6 | opentable.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
opentable.com receives 5.8x more monthly traffic than eater.com (45.2M vs 7.7M).
Acquisition Strategy
| eater.com | opentable.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 64% | Direct 36% | |
| Bounce Rate | 54.7% | 35.7% | opentable.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | opentable.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 160%
| Keyword | Volume | eater.com | opentable.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| evelyn | 35.1K | #9 | #4 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
eater.com acquires users primarily through Search (64%), while opentable.com relies on Direct (36%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — opentable.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while eater.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| eater.com | opentable.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 25y 9m | 27y 7m | opentable.com |
| Registered | Nov 2000 | Jan 1999 | |
| Expires | Nov 2026 | Jan 2029 |
Business Maturity · Insight
opentable.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| eater.com | opentable.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #9.9K | #1.1K | opentable.com |
| Category Rank | #12 | #4 | opentable.com |
eater.com only
opentable.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: eater.com could expand into Germany, while opentable.com could target Brazil.
Key Takeaways
- •opentable.com receives 5.8x more monthly traffic than eater.com (45.2M vs 7.7M).
- •eater.com acquires users primarily through Search (64%), while opentable.com relies on Direct (36%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — opentable.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while eater.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •opentable.com receives 5.8x more monthly traffic than eater.com (45.2M vs 7.7M).
- •opentable.com keeps visitors significantly longer (2m51s avg session vs eater.com's 1m25s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •opentable.com has a 19 percentage point lower bounce rate (36% vs 55%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •eater.com acquires traffic primarily through Search (64%), while opentable.com relies on Direct (36%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026