elsevier.com vs sciencedirect.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| elsevier.com | sciencedirect.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 39.1M | 73.7M | sciencedirect.com |
| Bounce Rate | 48.3% | 33.1% | sciencedirect.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 33y 2m | 29y 5m | elsevier.com |
sciencedirect.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while elsevier.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| elsevier.com | sciencedirect.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 39.1M | 73.7M | sciencedirect.com |
| MoM Change | +0% | -3% | elsevier.com |
| Avg. Session | 3m23s | 8m34s | sciencedirect.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.9 | 6.9 | sciencedirect.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
sciencedirect.com receives 1.9x more monthly traffic than elsevier.com (73.7M vs 39.1M).
Acquisition Strategy
| elsevier.com | sciencedirect.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 34% | Search 44% | |
| Bounce Rate | 48.3% | 33.1% | sciencedirect.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
elsevier.com acquires users primarily through Direct (34%), while sciencedirect.com relies on Search (44%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — elsevier.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while sciencedirect.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| elsevier.com | sciencedirect.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 33y 2m | 29y 5m | elsevier.com |
| Registered | Jul 1993 | Mar 1997 | |
| Expires | Jun 2031 | Mar 2031 |
Business Maturity · Insight
elsevier.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| elsevier.com | sciencedirect.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #1.3K | #416 | sciencedirect.com |
| Category Rank | #2 | #4 | elsevier.com |
elsevier.com only
sciencedirect.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: elsevier.com could expand into Germany, while sciencedirect.com could target Brazil.
Key Takeaways
- •sciencedirect.com receives 1.9x more monthly traffic than elsevier.com (73.7M vs 39.1M).
- •elsevier.com acquires users primarily through Direct (34%), while sciencedirect.com relies on Search (44%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — elsevier.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while sciencedirect.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •sciencedirect.com has 1.9x more traffic (73.7M vs 39.1M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •sciencedirect.com keeps visitors significantly longer (8m34s avg session vs elsevier.com's 3m23s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •sciencedirect.com has a 15 percentage point lower bounce rate (33% vs 48%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •elsevier.com acquires traffic primarily through Referral (39%), while sciencedirect.com relies on Search (44%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026