fast.com vs lightnode.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| fast.com | lightnode.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 79.9M | 369.2K | fast.com |
| Bounce Rate | 72.2% | 39.2% | lightnode.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 32y | 22y 6m | fast.com |
fast.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while lightnode.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| fast.com | lightnode.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 79.9M | 369.2K | fast.com |
| MoM Change | +5% | -24% | fast.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m33s | 1m25s | fast.com |
| Pages / Visit | 1.7 | 3.5 | lightnode.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
lightnode.com is losing traffic (-24%) despite 369.2K monthly visits. fast.com's +5% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| fast.com | lightnode.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 62% | Direct 43% | |
| Bounce Rate | 72.2% | 39.2% | lightnode.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 100%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
fast.com acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while lightnode.com relies on Direct (43%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — fast.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while lightnode.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| fast.com | lightnode.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 32y | 22y 6m | fast.com |
| Registered | Aug 1994 | Feb 2004 | |
| Expires | Aug 2026 | Mar 2031 |
Business Maturity · Insight
fast.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| fast.com | lightnode.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #885 | #116.9K | fast.com |
| Category Rank | #15 | #134 | fast.com |
fast.com only
lightnode.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: fast.com could expand into China, Vietnam, Pakistan, while lightnode.com could target United States, Brazil, Japan.
Key Takeaways
- •lightnode.com is losing traffic (-24%) despite 369.2K monthly visits. fast.com's +5% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •fast.com acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while lightnode.com relies on Direct (43%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — fast.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while lightnode.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •fast.com receives 216.3x more monthly traffic than lightnode.com (79.9M vs 369.2K).
- •fast.com is growing (+5%) while lightnode.com is declining (-24%).
- •lightnode.com has a 33 percentage point lower bounce rate (39% vs 72%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 30 keywords (100% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026