fast.com vs restream.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| fast.com | restream.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 79.9M | 3.4M | fast.com |
| Bounce Rate | 72.2% | 56.4% | restream.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 32y | 11y 9m | fast.com |
fast.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while restream.io leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| fast.com | restream.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 79.9M | 3.4M | fast.com |
| MoM Change | +5% | +1% | fast.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m33s | 2m07s | restream.io |
| Pages / Visit | 1.7 | 3.0 | restream.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
fast.com receives 23.6x more monthly traffic than restream.io (79.9M vs 3.4M).
Acquisition Strategy
| fast.com | restream.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 62% | Direct 48% | |
| Bounce Rate | 72.2% | 56.4% | restream.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 100%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
fast.com acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while restream.io relies on Direct (48%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — fast.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while restream.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| fast.com | restream.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 32y | 11y 9m | fast.com |
| Registered | Aug 1994 | Nov 2014 | |
| Expires | Aug 2026 | Nov 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
fast.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| fast.com | restream.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #885 | #18.9K | fast.com |
| Category Rank | #15 | #390 | fast.com |
fast.com only
restream.io only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: fast.com could expand into Kuwait, Mexico, while restream.io could target Japan, Bangladesh.
Key Takeaways
- •fast.com receives 23.6x more monthly traffic than restream.io (79.9M vs 3.4M).
- •fast.com acquires users primarily through Direct (62%), while restream.io relies on Direct (48%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — fast.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while restream.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •fast.com receives 23.6x more monthly traffic than restream.io (79.9M vs 3.4M).
- •restream.io has a 16 percentage point lower bounce rate (56% vs 72%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 30 keywords (100% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
- •restream.io depends on a single country for 37% of traffic, while fast.com is spread across more markets — lower geographic risk.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026