fec.gov vs whitehouse.gov
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| fec.gov | whitehouse.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 779.9K | 7.2M | whitehouse.gov |
| Bounce Rate | 35.8% | 69.2% | fec.gov |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 28y 11m | 28y 11m | fec.gov |
fec.gov leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while whitehouse.gov leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| fec.gov | whitehouse.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 779.9K | 7.2M | whitehouse.gov |
| MoM Change | +16% | +42% | whitehouse.gov |
| Avg. Session | 3m47s | 1m28s | fec.gov |
| Pages / Visit | 5.4 | 2.0 | fec.gov |
Growth Momentum · Insight
whitehouse.gov is growing faster (+42%) but visitors stay 2.6x shorter (1m28s vs 3m47s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| fec.gov | whitehouse.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 53% | Direct 40% | |
| Bounce Rate | 35.8% | 69.2% | fec.gov |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 28%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
fec.gov acquires users primarily through Search (53%), while whitehouse.gov relies on Direct (40%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — whitehouse.gov's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while fec.gov's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| fec.gov | whitehouse.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 28y 11m | 28y 11m | fec.gov |
| Registered | Oct 1997 | Oct 1997 | |
| Expires | Sep 2026 | Sep 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
fec.gov has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| fec.gov | whitehouse.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #51.9K | #10.2K | whitehouse.gov |
| Category Rank | #244 | #77 | whitehouse.gov |
| PH Upvotes | — | 98 |
fec.gov only
whitehouse.gov only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: fec.gov could expand into India, Brazil, while whitehouse.gov could target Netherlands, Israel.
Key Takeaways
- •whitehouse.gov is growing +42% while fec.gov grows +16%. At current trajectory, whitehouse.gov could close the traffic gap within 2 months.
- •whitehouse.gov is growing faster (+42%) but visitors stay 2.6x shorter (1m28s vs 3m47s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •fec.gov acquires users primarily through Search (53%), while whitehouse.gov relies on Direct (40%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — whitehouse.gov's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while fec.gov's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •whitehouse.gov receives 9.2x more monthly traffic than fec.gov (7.2M vs 779.9K).
- •Both are growing, with whitehouse.gov accelerating faster at +42% vs +16%.
- •fec.gov keeps visitors significantly longer (3m47s avg session vs whitehouse.gov's 1m28s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026