fillout.com vs typeform.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| fillout.com | typeform.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 4.6M | 30.5M | typeform.com |
| Bounce Rate | 57.5% | 59.7% | fillout.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | fillout.com |
| Domain Age | 25y 3m | 24y 2m | fillout.com |
fillout.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while typeform.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| fillout.com | typeform.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 4.6M | 30.5M | typeform.com |
| MoM Change | +10% | +2% | fillout.com |
| Avg. Session | 3m32s | 1m31s | fillout.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.3 | 2.4 | fillout.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
typeform.com receives 6.6x more monthly traffic than fillout.com (30.5M vs 4.6M).
Acquisition Strategy
| fillout.com | typeform.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 66% | Direct 55% | |
| Bounce Rate | 57.5% | 59.7% | fillout.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | fillout.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 86%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
fillout.com acquires users primarily through Direct (66%), while typeform.com relies on Direct (55%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — fillout.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while typeform.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| fillout.com | typeform.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 25y 3m | 24y 2m | fillout.com |
| Registered | May 2001 | Jun 2002 | |
| Expires | May 2030 | Jun 2034 |
Business Maturity · Insight
fillout.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| fillout.com | typeform.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #13.0K | #2.0K | typeform.com |
| Category Rank | #41 | #46 | fillout.com |
| PH Upvotes | — | 132 |
fillout.com only
typeform.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: fillout.com could expand into United Kingdom, Brazil, India, while typeform.com could target Philippines, Canada, Australia.
Key Takeaways
- •typeform.com receives 6.6x more monthly traffic than fillout.com (30.5M vs 4.6M).
- •fillout.com acquires users primarily through Direct (66%), while typeform.com relies on Direct (55%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — fillout.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while typeform.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •typeform.com receives 6.6x more monthly traffic than fillout.com (30.5M vs 4.6M).
- •Both are growing, with fillout.com accelerating faster at +10% vs +2%.
- •fillout.com keeps visitors significantly longer (3m32s avg session vs typeform.com's 1m31s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 30 keywords (86% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026