filmora.wondershare.com vs wondershare.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| filmora.wondershare.com | wondershare.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.6M | 8.0M | wondershare.com |
| Bounce Rate | 66.9% | 55.5% | wondershare.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 20 | 35 | wondershare.com |
| Domain Age | 22y 11m | 22y 11m | Tie |
wondershare.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while filmora.wondershare.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| filmora.wondershare.com | wondershare.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.6M | 8.0M | wondershare.com |
| MoM Change | -2% | -5% | filmora.wondershare.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m36s | 1m40s | wondershare.com |
| Pages / Visit | 1.9 | 2.4 | wondershare.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
wondershare.com receives 4.9x more monthly traffic than filmora.wondershare.com (8.0M vs 1.6M).
Acquisition Strategy
| filmora.wondershare.com | wondershare.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 49% | Search 51% | |
| Bounce Rate | 66.9% | 55.5% | wondershare.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 20 | 35 | wondershare.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 323%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
filmora.wondershare.com acquires users primarily through Search (49%), while wondershare.com relies on Search (51%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — filmora.wondershare.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while wondershare.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| filmora.wondershare.com | wondershare.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 22y 11m | 22y 11m | — |
| Registered | Sep 2003 | Sep 2003 | |
| Expires | Sep 2030 | Sep 2030 |
Business Maturity · Insight
wondershare.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| filmora.wondershare.com | wondershare.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | — | #8.4K | |
| Category Rank | — | #108 | |
| PH Upvotes | — | 6 |
filmora.wondershare.com only
wondershare.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: filmora.wondershare.com could expand into Japan, Brazil, while wondershare.com could target Pakistan, Philippines.
Key Takeaways
- •wondershare.com receives 4.9x more monthly traffic than filmora.wondershare.com (8.0M vs 1.6M).
- •filmora.wondershare.com acquires users primarily through Search (49%), while wondershare.com relies on Search (51%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — filmora.wondershare.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while wondershare.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •wondershare.com receives 4.9x more monthly traffic than filmora.wondershare.com (8.0M vs 1.6M).
- •wondershare.com has a 11 percentage point lower bounce rate (56% vs 67%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 42 keywords (323% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
- •wondershare.com has 1.8x more ranking keywords (35 vs 20), indicating broader SEO footprint.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026