filmora.io vs filmora.wondershare.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| filmora.io | filmora.wondershare.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 134.0K | 1.6M | filmora.wondershare.com |
| Bounce Rate | 37.4% | 66.9% | filmora.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 20 | filmora.io |
| Domain Age | 9y 12m | 22y 11m | filmora.wondershare.com |
filmora.io leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while filmora.wondershare.com leads in 2.
Growth Momentum
| filmora.io | filmora.wondershare.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 134.0K | 1.6M | filmora.wondershare.com |
| MoM Change | -4% | -2% | filmora.wondershare.com |
| Avg. Session | 0m45s | 1m36s | filmora.wondershare.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.2 | 1.9 | filmora.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
filmora.wondershare.com receives 12.2x more monthly traffic than filmora.io (1.6M vs 134.0K).
Acquisition Strategy
| filmora.io | filmora.wondershare.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 67% | Search 49% | |
| Bounce Rate | 37.4% | 66.9% | filmora.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 20 | filmora.io |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
filmora.io acquires users primarily through Direct (67%), while filmora.wondershare.com relies on Search (49%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — filmora.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while filmora.wondershare.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| filmora.io | filmora.wondershare.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 9y 12m | 22y 11m | filmora.wondershare.com |
| Registered | Sep 2016 | Sep 2003 | |
| Expires | Sep 2027 | Sep 2030 |
Business Maturity · Insight
filmora.wondershare.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| filmora.io | filmora.wondershare.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #308.9K | — | |
| Category Rank | #2.2K | — |
filmora.io only
filmora.wondershare.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: filmora.io could expand into Indonesia, Pakistan, Philippines, while filmora.wondershare.com could target Japan, Peru, France.
Key Takeaways
- •filmora.wondershare.com receives 12.2x more monthly traffic than filmora.io (1.6M vs 134.0K).
- •filmora.io acquires users primarily through Direct (67%), while filmora.wondershare.com relies on Search (49%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — filmora.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while filmora.wondershare.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •filmora.wondershare.com receives 12.2x more monthly traffic than filmora.io (1.6M vs 134.0K).
- •filmora.wondershare.com keeps visitors significantly longer (1m36s avg session vs filmora.io's 0m45s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •filmora.io has a 29 percentage point lower bounce rate (37% vs 67%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •filmora.io acquires traffic primarily through Direct (67%), while filmora.wondershare.com relies on Search (49%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026