flashscoreusa.com vs tennis.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| flashscoreusa.com | tennis.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.8M | 1.0M | flashscoreusa.com |
| Bounce Rate | 31.6% | 55.3% | flashscoreusa.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 2y 10m | 30y 2m | tennis.com |
flashscoreusa.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while tennis.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| flashscoreusa.com | tennis.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.8M | 1.0M | flashscoreusa.com |
| MoM Change | +10% | -16% | flashscoreusa.com |
| Avg. Session | 6m01s | 1m26s | flashscoreusa.com |
| Pages / Visit | 5.0 | 3.0 | flashscoreusa.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
tennis.com is losing traffic (-16%) despite 1.0M monthly visits. flashscoreusa.com's +10% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| flashscoreusa.com | tennis.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 54% | Direct 58% | |
| Bounce Rate | 31.6% | 55.3% | flashscoreusa.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 82%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
flashscoreusa.com acquires users primarily through Direct (54%), while tennis.com relies on Direct (58%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — tennis.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while flashscoreusa.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| flashscoreusa.com | tennis.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 2y 10m | 30y 2m | tennis.com |
| Registered | Oct 2023 | Jun 1996 | |
| Expires | Oct 2028 | Jun 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
tennis.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| flashscoreusa.com | tennis.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #20.1K | #52.8K | flashscoreusa.com |
| Category Rank | #6 | #13 | flashscoreusa.com |
flashscoreusa.com only
tennis.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: flashscoreusa.com could expand into Canada, Philippines, Ireland, while tennis.com could target Tunisia, Poland, Morocco.
Key Takeaways
- •tennis.com is losing traffic (-16%) despite 1.0M monthly visits. flashscoreusa.com's +10% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •flashscoreusa.com acquires users primarily through Direct (54%), while tennis.com relies on Direct (58%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — tennis.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while flashscoreusa.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •flashscoreusa.com receives 2.6x more monthly traffic than tennis.com (2.8M vs 1.0M).
- •flashscoreusa.com is growing (+10%) while tennis.com is declining (-16%).
- •flashscoreusa.com keeps visitors significantly longer (6m01s avg session vs tennis.com's 1m26s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •flashscoreusa.com has a 24 percentage point lower bounce rate (32% vs 55%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026