fotmob.com vs sofascore.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| fotmob.com | sofascore.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 34.3M | 94.0M | sofascore.com |
| Bounce Rate | 30.6% | 51.5% | fotmob.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 17y 11m | 14y 3m | fotmob.com |
fotmob.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while sofascore.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| fotmob.com | sofascore.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 34.3M | 94.0M | sofascore.com |
| MoM Change | -17% | -13% | sofascore.com |
| Avg. Session | 4m60s | 5m13s | sofascore.com |
| Pages / Visit | 7.3 | 4.3 | fotmob.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
sofascore.com receives 2.7x more monthly traffic than fotmob.com (94.0M vs 34.3M).
Acquisition Strategy
| fotmob.com | sofascore.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 74% | Direct 54% | |
| Bounce Rate | 30.6% | 51.5% | fotmob.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 7%
| Keyword | Volume | fotmob.com | sofascore.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| rayan | 152.6K | #6 | #9 |
| napoli vs como | 8.7K | #6 | #2 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
fotmob.com acquires users primarily through Direct (74%), while sofascore.com relies on Direct (54%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — fotmob.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while sofascore.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| fotmob.com | sofascore.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 17y 11m | 14y 3m | fotmob.com |
| Registered | Sep 2008 | May 2012 | |
| Expires | Sep 2026 | May 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
fotmob.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| fotmob.com | sofascore.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #1.2K | #528 | sofascore.com |
| Category Rank | #4 | #5 | fotmob.com |
fotmob.com only
sofascore.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: fotmob.com could expand into Brazil, Italy, Peru, while sofascore.com could target India, Norway, South Korea.
Key Takeaways
- •sofascore.com receives 2.7x more monthly traffic than fotmob.com (94.0M vs 34.3M).
- •fotmob.com acquires users primarily through Direct (74%), while sofascore.com relies on Direct (54%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — fotmob.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while sofascore.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •sofascore.com receives 2.7x more monthly traffic than fotmob.com (94.0M vs 34.3M).
- •fotmob.com has a 21 percentage point lower bounce rate (31% vs 51%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •With only 7% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
- •fotmob.com has a 4-year head start in the market.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026