foxweather.com vs weatherbug.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| foxweather.com | weatherbug.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 15.5M | 11.4M | foxweather.com |
| Bounce Rate | 48.0% | 41.1% | weatherbug.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 31y 3m | 26y 11m | foxweather.com |
foxweather.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while weatherbug.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| foxweather.com | weatherbug.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 15.5M | 11.4M | foxweather.com |
| MoM Change | +57% | +23% | foxweather.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m12s | 2m45s | weatherbug.com |
| Pages / Visit | 1.9 | 3.4 | weatherbug.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
foxweather.com is growing faster (+57%) but visitors stay 2.3x shorter (1m12s vs 2m45s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| foxweather.com | weatherbug.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 41% | Direct 66% | |
| Bounce Rate | 48.0% | 41.1% | weatherbug.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 253%
| Keyword | Volume | foxweather.com | weatherbug.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| the weather today | 3.3K | #8 | #7 |
| dunellen weather | 1.5K | #6 | #7 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
foxweather.com acquires users primarily through Direct (41%), while weatherbug.com relies on Direct (66%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — weatherbug.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while weatherbug.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| foxweather.com | weatherbug.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 31y 3m | 26y 11m | foxweather.com |
| Registered | May 1995 | Sep 1999 | |
| Expires | May 2026 | Sep 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
foxweather.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| foxweather.com | weatherbug.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #4.8K | #5.6K | foxweather.com |
| Category Rank | #9 | #10 | foxweather.com |
foxweather.com only
weatherbug.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: foxweather.com could expand into Sweden, Belgium, while weatherbug.com could target France, Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •foxweather.com is growing +57% while weatherbug.com grows +23%. At current trajectory, foxweather.com could close the traffic gap within 1 months.
- •foxweather.com is growing faster (+57%) but visitors stay 2.3x shorter (1m12s vs 2m45s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •foxweather.com acquires users primarily through Direct (41%), while weatherbug.com relies on Direct (66%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — weatherbug.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while weatherbug.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •foxweather.com has 1.4x more traffic (15.5M vs 11.4M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •Both are growing, with foxweather.com accelerating faster at +57% vs +23%.
- •weatherbug.com keeps visitors significantly longer (2m45s avg session vs foxweather.com's 1m12s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026