geonode.com vs proxysite.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| geonode.com | proxysite.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 260.3K | 12.4M | proxysite.com |
| Bounce Rate | 41.0% | 12.8% | proxysite.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 22y 11m | 25y 8m | proxysite.com |
proxysite.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while geonode.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| geonode.com | proxysite.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 260.3K | 12.4M | proxysite.com |
| MoM Change | -7% | +4% | proxysite.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m01s | 8m19s | proxysite.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.0 | 22.6 | proxysite.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
geonode.com is losing traffic (-7%) despite 260.3K monthly visits. proxysite.com's +4% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| geonode.com | proxysite.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 52% | Search 61% | |
| Bounce Rate | 41.0% | 12.8% | proxysite.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 62%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
geonode.com acquires users primarily through Search (52%), while proxysite.com relies on Search (61%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — geonode.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while proxysite.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| geonode.com | proxysite.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 22y 11m | 25y 8m | proxysite.com |
| Registered | Sep 2003 | Jan 2001 | |
| Expires | Sep 2031 | Jan 2029 |
Business Maturity · Insight
proxysite.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| geonode.com | proxysite.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #193.4K | #1.7K | proxysite.com |
| Category Rank | #667 | #2 | proxysite.com |
geonode.com only
proxysite.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: geonode.com could expand into South Korea, Türkiye, while proxysite.com could target United Kingdom, Bangladesh.
Key Takeaways
- •geonode.com is losing traffic (-7%) despite 260.3K monthly visits. proxysite.com's +4% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •geonode.com acquires users primarily through Search (52%), while proxysite.com relies on Search (61%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — geonode.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while proxysite.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •proxysite.com receives 47.5x more monthly traffic than geonode.com (12.4M vs 260.3K).
- •proxysite.com is growing (+4%) while geonode.com is declining (-7%).
- •proxysite.com keeps visitors significantly longer (8m19s avg session vs geonode.com's 1m01s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •proxysite.com has a 28 percentage point lower bounce rate (13% vs 41%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026