gisgeography.com vs ontheworldmap.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| gisgeography.com | ontheworldmap.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 954.5K | 767.6K | gisgeography.com |
| Bounce Rate | 62.1% | 49.1% | ontheworldmap.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 12y 3m | 14y 7m | ontheworldmap.com |
ontheworldmap.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while gisgeography.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| gisgeography.com | ontheworldmap.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 954.5K | 767.6K | gisgeography.com |
| MoM Change | -8% | +4% | ontheworldmap.com |
| Avg. Session | 0m34s | 0m59s | ontheworldmap.com |
| Pages / Visit | 1.5 | 2.1 | ontheworldmap.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
gisgeography.com is losing traffic (-8%) despite 954.5K monthly visits. ontheworldmap.com's +4% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| gisgeography.com | ontheworldmap.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 89% | Search 80% | |
| Bounce Rate | 62.1% | 49.1% | ontheworldmap.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
gisgeography.com acquires users primarily through Search (89%), while ontheworldmap.com relies on Search (80%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ontheworldmap.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while gisgeography.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| gisgeography.com | ontheworldmap.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 12y 3m | 14y 7m | ontheworldmap.com |
| Registered | May 2014 | Jan 2012 | |
| Expires | May 2026 | Jan 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
ontheworldmap.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| gisgeography.com | ontheworldmap.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #72.3K | #76.9K | gisgeography.com |
| Category Rank | #9 | #290 | gisgeography.com |
Key Takeaways
- •gisgeography.com is losing traffic (-8%) despite 954.5K monthly visits. ontheworldmap.com's +4% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •gisgeography.com acquires users primarily through Search (89%), while ontheworldmap.com relies on Search (80%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ontheworldmap.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while gisgeography.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •gisgeography.com has 1.2x more traffic (954.5K vs 767.6K), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •ontheworldmap.com is growing (+4%) while gisgeography.com is declining (-8%).
- •ontheworldmap.com keeps visitors significantly longer (0m59s avg session vs gisgeography.com's 0m34s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •ontheworldmap.com has a 13 percentage point lower bounce rate (49% vs 62%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026