ontheworldmap.com vs ua.edu
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| ontheworldmap.com | ua.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 767.6K | 2.1M | ua.edu |
| Bounce Rate | 49.1% | 38.0% | ua.edu |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 29 | ontheworldmap.com |
| Domain Age | 14y 7m | — |
ua.edu leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while ontheworldmap.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| ontheworldmap.com | ua.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 767.6K | 2.1M | ua.edu |
| MoM Change | +4% | +27% | ua.edu |
| Avg. Session | 0m59s | 3m24s | ua.edu |
| Pages / Visit | 2.1 | 4.5 | ua.edu |
Growth Momentum · Insight
ua.edu is growing +27% while ontheworldmap.com grows +4%. At current trajectory, ua.edu could close the traffic gap within 2 months.
Acquisition Strategy
| ontheworldmap.com | ua.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 80% | Direct 33% | |
| Bounce Rate | 49.1% | 38.0% | ua.edu |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 29 | ontheworldmap.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 28%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
ontheworldmap.com acquires users primarily through Search (80%), while ua.edu relies on Direct (33%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ua.edu's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ontheworldmap.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| ontheworldmap.com | ua.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 14y 7m | — | |
| Registered | Jan 2012 | — | |
| Expires | Jan 2027 | — |
Market Position
| ontheworldmap.com | ua.edu | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #76.9K | #24.9K | ua.edu |
| Category Rank | #290 | #181 | ua.edu |
ontheworldmap.com only
ua.edu only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: ontheworldmap.com could expand into Sweden, Mexico, while ua.edu could target Canada, Australia.
Key Takeaways
- •ua.edu is growing +27% while ontheworldmap.com grows +4%. At current trajectory, ua.edu could close the traffic gap within 2 months.
- •ontheworldmap.com acquires users primarily through Search (80%), while ua.edu relies on Direct (33%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — ua.edu's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while ontheworldmap.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •ua.edu receives 2.7x more monthly traffic than ontheworldmap.com (2.1M vs 767.6K).
- •Both are growing, with ua.edu accelerating faster at +27% vs +4%.
- •ua.edu keeps visitors significantly longer (3m24s avg session vs ontheworldmap.com's 0m59s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •ua.edu has a 11 percentage point lower bounce rate (38% vs 49%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026