goodspace.ai vs scale.jobs
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| goodspace.ai | scale.jobs | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 301.4K | 274.2K | goodspace.ai |
| Bounce Rate | 46.5% | 32.3% | scale.jobs |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | goodspace.ai |
| Domain Age | 3y 7m | 2y 9m | goodspace.ai |
goodspace.ai leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while scale.jobs leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| goodspace.ai | scale.jobs | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 301.4K | 274.2K | goodspace.ai |
| MoM Change | +61% | +30% | goodspace.ai |
| Avg. Session | 2m19s | 6m47s | scale.jobs |
| Pages / Visit | 3.2 | 8.0 | scale.jobs |
Growth Momentum · Insight
goodspace.ai is growing faster (+61%) but visitors stay 2.9x shorter (2m19s vs 6m47s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| goodspace.ai | scale.jobs | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 21% | Direct 67% | |
| Bounce Rate | 46.5% | 32.3% | scale.jobs |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | goodspace.ai |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 364%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
goodspace.ai acquires users primarily through Direct (21%), while scale.jobs relies on Direct (67%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — scale.jobs's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while goodspace.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| goodspace.ai | scale.jobs | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 3y 7m | 2y 9m | goodspace.ai |
| Registered | Jan 2023 | Nov 2023 | |
| Expires | Jan 2027 | Nov 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
goodspace.ai has been in the market 1 years longer (4y vs 3y). goodspace.ai's longer track record suggests established operations, while scale.jobs's entry timing indicates the market still attracts new players.
Market Position
| goodspace.ai | scale.jobs | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #146.3K | #126.8K | scale.jobs |
| Category Rank | #224 | #344 | goodspace.ai |
goodspace.ai only
scale.jobs only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: goodspace.ai could expand into Canada, Nigeria, Pakistan, while scale.jobs could target United Kingdom, Germany, Indonesia.
Key Takeaways
- •goodspace.ai receives 1.1x more monthly traffic than scale.jobs (301.4K vs 274.2K).
- •goodspace.ai is growing faster (+61%) but visitors stay 2.9x shorter (2m19s vs 6m47s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •goodspace.ai acquires users primarily through Direct (21%), while scale.jobs relies on Direct (67%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — scale.jobs's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while goodspace.ai's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •Both are growing, with goodspace.ai accelerating faster at +61% vs +30%.
- •scale.jobs keeps visitors significantly longer (6m47s avg session vs goodspace.ai's 2m19s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •scale.jobs has a 14 percentage point lower bounce rate (32% vs 47%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026