gpt.space vs openai.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| gpt.space | openai.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 282.1K | 197.2M | openai.com |
| Bounce Rate | 39.2% | 57.9% | gpt.space |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 3y 6m | 19y 7m | openai.com |
openai.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while gpt.space leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| gpt.space | openai.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 282.1K | 197.2M | openai.com |
| MoM Change | +12% | +4% | gpt.space |
| Avg. Session | 1m01s | 2m31s | openai.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.6 | 3.0 | gpt.space |
Growth Momentum · Insight
gpt.space is growing +12% while openai.com grows +4%. At current trajectory, gpt.space could close the traffic gap within 25 months.
Acquisition Strategy
| gpt.space | openai.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 47% | Direct 57% | |
| Bounce Rate | 39.2% | 57.9% | gpt.space |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 35 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | gpt.space | openai.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| gpt for sheets and docs | 3.4K | #2 | #9 |
| gpt for sheets | 3.1K | #3 | #6 |
| chatgpt for google | 2.6K | #6 | #8 |
| gpt team | 1.7K | #5 | #1 |
| gpt workspace | 1.1K | #1 | #3 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
gpt.space acquires users primarily through Direct (47%), while openai.com relies on Direct (57%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — openai.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while openai.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| gpt.space | openai.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 3y 6m | 19y 7m | openai.com |
| Registered | Feb 2023 | Jan 2007 | |
| Expires | Feb 2027 | Jan 2029 |
Business Maturity · Insight
openai.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| gpt.space | openai.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #142.2K | #212 | openai.com |
| Category Rank | #126 | #5 | openai.com |
| PH Upvotes | — | 683 |
gpt.space only
openai.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: gpt.space could expand into India, Japan, South Korea, while openai.com could target Indonesia, Vietnam, Peru.
Key Takeaways
- •gpt.space is growing +12% while openai.com grows +4%. At current trajectory, gpt.space could close the traffic gap within 25 months.
- •gpt.space acquires users primarily through Direct (47%), while openai.com relies on Direct (57%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — openai.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while openai.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •openai.com receives 699.2x more monthly traffic than gpt.space (197.2M vs 282.1K).
- •Both are growing, with gpt.space accelerating faster at +12% vs +4%.
- •openai.com keeps visitors significantly longer (2m31s avg session vs gpt.space's 1m01s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •gpt.space has a 19 percentage point lower bounce rate (39% vs 58%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026