hackmd.io vs runoob.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| hackmd.io | runoob.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.4M | 2.6M | runoob.com |
| Bounce Rate | 51.7% | 55.1% | hackmd.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 11y 4m | 11y 2m | hackmd.io |
hackmd.io leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while runoob.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| hackmd.io | runoob.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.4M | 2.6M | runoob.com |
| MoM Change | -8% | +7% | runoob.com |
| Avg. Session | 2m36s | 3m07s | runoob.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.0 | 2.6 | hackmd.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
hackmd.io is losing traffic (-8%) despite 2.4M monthly visits. runoob.com's +7% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| hackmd.io | runoob.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 49% | Search 63% | |
| Bounce Rate | 51.7% | 55.1% | hackmd.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 100%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
hackmd.io acquires users primarily through Direct (49%), while runoob.com relies on Search (63%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — hackmd.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while runoob.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| hackmd.io | runoob.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 11y 4m | 11y 2m | hackmd.io |
| Registered | Apr 2015 | Jun 2015 | |
| Expires | Apr 2027 | Jun 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
hackmd.io has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| hackmd.io | runoob.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #25.0K | #25.6K | hackmd.io |
| Category Rank | #17 | — |
hackmd.io only
runoob.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: hackmd.io could expand into China, Hong Kong SAR China, Singapore, while runoob.com could target India, Japan, Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •hackmd.io is losing traffic (-8%) despite 2.4M monthly visits. runoob.com's +7% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •hackmd.io acquires users primarily through Direct (49%), while runoob.com relies on Search (63%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — hackmd.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while runoob.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •runoob.com is growing (+7%) while hackmd.io is declining (-8%).
- •hackmd.io acquires traffic primarily through Direct (49%), while runoob.com relies on Search (63%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 30 keywords (100% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026