imweb.me vs namu.wiki
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| imweb.me | namu.wiki | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 6.1M | 333.1M | namu.wiki |
| Bounce Rate | 49.3% | 40.1% | namu.wiki |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 10y 3m | 11y 4m | namu.wiki |
namu.wiki leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while imweb.me leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| imweb.me | namu.wiki | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 6.1M | 333.1M | namu.wiki |
| MoM Change | -6% | +3% | namu.wiki |
| Avg. Session | 3m50s | 7m52s | namu.wiki |
| Pages / Visit | 4.7 | 5.0 | namu.wiki |
Growth Momentum · Insight
imweb.me is losing traffic (-6%) despite 6.1M monthly visits. namu.wiki's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| imweb.me | namu.wiki | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 47% | Search 74% | |
| Bounce Rate | 49.3% | 40.1% | namu.wiki |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 5%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
imweb.me acquires users primarily through Direct (47%), while namu.wiki relies on Search (74%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — imweb.me's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while namu.wiki's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| imweb.me | namu.wiki | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 10y 3m | 11y 4m | namu.wiki |
| Registered | May 2016 | Apr 2015 | |
| Expires | May 2026 | Apr 2031 |
Business Maturity · Insight
namu.wiki has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| imweb.me | namu.wiki | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #9.0K | #108 | namu.wiki |
| Category Rank | #38 | #1 | namu.wiki |
| PH Upvotes | 13 | — |
imweb.me only
namu.wiki only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: imweb.me could expand into Canada, Germany, while namu.wiki could target Taiwan, Vietnam.
Key Takeaways
- •imweb.me is losing traffic (-6%) despite 6.1M monthly visits. namu.wiki's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •imweb.me acquires users primarily through Direct (47%), while namu.wiki relies on Search (74%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — imweb.me's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while namu.wiki's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •namu.wiki receives 54.3x more monthly traffic than imweb.me (333.1M vs 6.1M).
- •namu.wiki is growing (+3%) while imweb.me is declining (-6%).
- •namu.wiki keeps visitors significantly longer (7m52s avg session vs imweb.me's 3m50s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •namu.wiki has a 9 percentage point lower bounce rate (40% vs 49%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026