namu.wiki vs sites.google.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| namu.wiki | sites.google.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 333.1M | 215.7M | namu.wiki |
| Bounce Rate | 40.1% | 53.3% | namu.wiki |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 20 | namu.wiki |
| Domain Age | 11y 4m | 28y 11m | sites.google.com |
namu.wiki leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while sites.google.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| namu.wiki | sites.google.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 333.1M | 215.7M | namu.wiki |
| MoM Change | +3% | -2% | namu.wiki |
| Avg. Session | 7m52s | 4m22s | namu.wiki |
| Pages / Visit | 5.0 | 3.5 | namu.wiki |
Growth Momentum · Insight
sites.google.com is losing traffic (-2%) despite 215.7M monthly visits. namu.wiki's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| namu.wiki | sites.google.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 74% | Direct 46% | |
| Bounce Rate | 40.1% | 53.3% | namu.wiki |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 20 | namu.wiki |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 67%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
namu.wiki acquires users primarily through Search (74%), while sites.google.com relies on Direct (46%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — sites.google.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while namu.wiki's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| namu.wiki | sites.google.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 11y 4m | 28y 11m | sites.google.com |
| Registered | Apr 2015 | Sep 1997 | |
| Expires | Apr 2031 | Sep 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
sites.google.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| namu.wiki | sites.google.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #108 | — | |
| Category Rank | #1 | — |
namu.wiki only
sites.google.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: namu.wiki could expand into Brazil, India, while sites.google.com could target Canada, Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •sites.google.com is losing traffic (-2%) despite 215.7M monthly visits. namu.wiki's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •namu.wiki acquires users primarily through Search (74%), while sites.google.com relies on Direct (46%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — sites.google.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while namu.wiki's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •namu.wiki has 1.5x more traffic (333.1M vs 215.7M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •namu.wiki is growing (+3%) while sites.google.com is declining (-2%).
- •namu.wiki keeps visitors significantly longer (7m52s avg session vs sites.google.com's 4m22s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •namu.wiki has a 13 percentage point lower bounce rate (40% vs 53%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026