jusoya.com vs namu.wiki
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| jusoya.com | namu.wiki | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 853.8K | 333.1M | namu.wiki |
| Bounce Rate | 43.4% | 40.1% | namu.wiki |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 6y 1m | 11y 4m | namu.wiki |
namu.wiki leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while jusoya.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| jusoya.com | namu.wiki | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 853.8K | 333.1M | namu.wiki |
| MoM Change | -45% | +3% | namu.wiki |
| Avg. Session | 1m48s | 7m52s | namu.wiki |
| Pages / Visit | 3.3 | 5.0 | namu.wiki |
Growth Momentum · Insight
jusoya.com is losing traffic (-45%) despite 853.8K monthly visits. namu.wiki's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| jusoya.com | namu.wiki | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 64% | Search 74% | |
| Bounce Rate | 43.4% | 40.1% | namu.wiki |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 15%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
jusoya.com acquires users primarily through Search (64%), while namu.wiki relies on Search (74%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — jusoya.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while namu.wiki's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| jusoya.com | namu.wiki | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 6y 1m | 11y 4m | namu.wiki |
| Registered | Jul 2020 | Apr 2015 | |
| Expires | Jul 2026 | Apr 2031 |
Business Maturity · Insight
namu.wiki has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| jusoya.com | namu.wiki | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #57.2K | #108 | namu.wiki |
| Category Rank | #225 | #1 | namu.wiki |
jusoya.com only
namu.wiki only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: jusoya.com could expand into Germany, while namu.wiki could target Singapore.
Key Takeaways
- •jusoya.com is losing traffic (-45%) despite 853.8K monthly visits. namu.wiki's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •jusoya.com acquires users primarily through Search (64%), while namu.wiki relies on Search (74%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — jusoya.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while namu.wiki's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •namu.wiki receives 390.1x more monthly traffic than jusoya.com (333.1M vs 853.8K).
- •namu.wiki is growing (+3%) while jusoya.com is declining (-45%).
- •namu.wiki keeps visitors significantly longer (7m52s avg session vs jusoya.com's 1m48s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 8 keywords (15% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026