keepo.bio vs Liinks
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| keepo.bio | Liinks | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 266.1K | 596.7K | Liinks |
| Bounce Rate | 53.1% | 71.9% | keepo.bio |
| Est. MRR | — | $31.0K | |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | Liinks |
| Domain Age | 3y 6m | 6y 6m | Liinks |
Liinks leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while keepo.bio leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| keepo.bio | Liinks | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 266.1K | 596.7K | Liinks |
| MoM Change | +16% | +15% | keepo.bio |
| Avg. Session | 2m21s | 0m34s | keepo.bio |
| Pages / Visit | 2.4 | 1.6 | keepo.bio |
Growth Momentum · Insight
Liinks receives 2.2x more monthly traffic than keepo.bio (596.7K vs 266.1K).
Acquisition Strategy
| keepo.bio | Liinks | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 46% | Direct 30% | |
| Bounce Rate | 53.1% | 71.9% | keepo.bio |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | Liinks |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 7%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
keepo.bio acquires users primarily through Direct (46%), while Liinks relies on Direct (30%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — keepo.bio's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while keepo.bio's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
Revenue estimates are derived from public data sources. Actual figures may differ.
| keepo.bio | Liinks | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Est. MRR | — | $31.0K | |
| Revenue / Visit | — | $0.052 | |
| Domain Age | 3y 6m | 6y 6m | Liinks |
| Registered | Feb 2023 | Feb 2020 | |
| Expires | Feb 2027 | Feb 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
Liinks has reached $31.0K MRR in 7 years while keepo.bio shows no public revenue data after 3 years — suggesting different monetization maturity or disclosure strategies.
Market Position
| keepo.bio | Liinks | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #183.4K | #107.2K | Liinks |
| Category Rank | #139 | #221 | keepo.bio |
keepo.bio only
Liinks only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: keepo.bio could expand into Germany, Canada, United Kingdom, while Liinks could target Portugal, Vietnam, France.
Key Takeaways
- •Liinks receives 2.2x more monthly traffic than keepo.bio (596.7K vs 266.1K).
- •keepo.bio acquires users primarily through Direct (46%), while Liinks relies on Direct (30%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — keepo.bio's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while keepo.bio's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •Liinks receives 2.2x more monthly traffic than keepo.bio (596.7K vs 266.1K).
- •keepo.bio keeps visitors significantly longer (2m21s avg session vs Liinks's 0m34s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •keepo.bio has a 19 percentage point lower bounce rate (53% vs 72%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •keepo.bio acquires traffic primarily through Direct (46%), while Liinks relies on Social (58%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026