keepo.bio vs linktr.ee
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| keepo.bio | linktr.ee | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 266.1K | 205.6M | linktr.ee |
| Bounce Rate | 53.1% | 70.0% | keepo.bio |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 3y 6m | 10y 6m | linktr.ee |
linktr.ee leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while keepo.bio leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| keepo.bio | linktr.ee | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 266.1K | 205.6M | linktr.ee |
| MoM Change | +16% | +7% | keepo.bio |
| Avg. Session | 2m21s | 1m21s | keepo.bio |
| Pages / Visit | 2.4 | 1.9 | keepo.bio |
Growth Momentum · Insight
keepo.bio is growing +16% while linktr.ee grows +7%. At current trajectory, keepo.bio could close the traffic gap within 14 months.
Acquisition Strategy
| keepo.bio | linktr.ee | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 46% | Direct 26% | |
| Bounce Rate | 53.1% | 70.0% | keepo.bio |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 67%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
keepo.bio acquires users primarily through Direct (46%), while linktr.ee relies on Direct (26%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — keepo.bio's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while keepo.bio's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| keepo.bio | linktr.ee | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 3y 6m | 10y 6m | linktr.ee |
| Registered | Feb 2023 | Mar 2016 | |
| Expires | Feb 2027 | — |
Business Maturity · Insight
linktr.ee has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| keepo.bio | linktr.ee | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #183.4K | #257 | linktr.ee |
| Category Rank | #139 | #1 | linktr.ee |
| PH Upvotes | — | 113 |
keepo.bio only
linktr.ee only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: keepo.bio could expand into Indonesia, United Kingdom, Canada, while linktr.ee could target Portugal, Vietnam, France.
Key Takeaways
- •keepo.bio is growing +16% while linktr.ee grows +7%. At current trajectory, keepo.bio could close the traffic gap within 14 months.
- •keepo.bio acquires users primarily through Direct (46%), while linktr.ee relies on Direct (26%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — keepo.bio's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while keepo.bio's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •linktr.ee receives 772.8x more monthly traffic than keepo.bio (205.6M vs 266.1K).
- •Both are growing, with keepo.bio accelerating faster at +16% vs +7%.
- •keepo.bio keeps visitors significantly longer (2m21s avg session vs linktr.ee's 1m21s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •keepo.bio has a 17 percentage point lower bounce rate (53% vs 70%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026