lastwordonsports.com vs tennis.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| lastwordonsports.com | tennis.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.2M | 1.0M | lastwordonsports.com |
| Bounce Rate | 54.1% | 55.3% | lastwordonsports.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 14y 12m | 30y 2m | tennis.com |
lastwordonsports.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while tennis.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| lastwordonsports.com | tennis.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.2M | 1.0M | lastwordonsports.com |
| MoM Change | -5% | -16% | lastwordonsports.com |
| Avg. Session | 2m00s | 1m26s | lastwordonsports.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.3 | 3.0 | tennis.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
lastwordonsports.com receives 1.1x more monthly traffic than tennis.com (1.2M vs 1.0M).
Acquisition Strategy
| lastwordonsports.com | tennis.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 54% | Direct 58% | |
| Bounce Rate | 54.1% | 55.3% | lastwordonsports.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 25%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
lastwordonsports.com acquires users primarily through Search (54%), while tennis.com relies on Direct (58%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — tennis.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while lastwordonsports.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| lastwordonsports.com | tennis.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 14y 12m | 30y 2m | tennis.com |
| Registered | Aug 2011 | Jun 1996 | |
| Expires | Aug 2028 | Jun 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
tennis.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| lastwordonsports.com | tennis.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #54.0K | #52.8K | tennis.com |
| Category Rank | #330 | #13 | tennis.com |
lastwordonsports.com only
tennis.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: lastwordonsports.com could expand into Philippines, Ireland, while tennis.com could target Australia, India.
Key Takeaways
- •lastwordonsports.com receives 1.1x more monthly traffic than tennis.com (1.2M vs 1.0M).
- •lastwordonsports.com acquires users primarily through Search (54%), while tennis.com relies on Direct (58%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — tennis.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while lastwordonsports.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •lastwordonsports.com acquires traffic primarily through Search (54%), while tennis.com relies on Direct (58%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •They share 12 keywords (25% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
- •tennis.com has a 15-year head start in the market.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026