live.com vs office.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| live.com | office.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1351.8M | 509.7M | live.com |
| Bounce Rate | 24.5% | 35.0% | live.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 31y 8m | 27y 4m | live.com |
live.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while office.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| live.com | office.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1351.8M | 509.7M | live.com |
| MoM Change | +3% | -5% | live.com |
| Avg. Session | 6m13s | 7m03s | office.com |
| Pages / Visit | 6.9 | 6.3 | live.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
office.com is losing traffic (-5%) despite 509.7M monthly visits. live.com's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| live.com | office.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 64% | Direct 63% | |
| Bounce Rate | 24.5% | 35.0% | live.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 400%
| Keyword | Volume | live.com | office.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| outlook | 17.1M | #1 | #3 |
| hotmail | 11.8M | #1 | #10 |
| onedrive | 5.0M | #2 | #6 |
| 2.9M | #6 | #5 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
live.com acquires users primarily through Direct (64%), while office.com relies on Direct (63%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — live.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while office.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| live.com | office.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 31y 8m | 27y 4m | live.com |
| Registered | Dec 1994 | Apr 1999 | |
| Expires | Dec 2026 | Apr 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
live.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| live.com | office.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #25 | #69 | live.com |
| Category Rank | #1 | #3 | live.com |
live.com only
office.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: live.com could expand into Japan, India, while office.com could target Canada, France.
Key Takeaways
- •office.com is losing traffic (-5%) despite 509.7M monthly visits. live.com's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •live.com acquires users primarily through Direct (64%), while office.com relies on Direct (63%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — live.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while office.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •live.com receives 2.7x more monthly traffic than office.com (1351.8M vs 509.7M).
- •live.com is growing (+3%) while office.com is declining (-5%).
- •live.com has a 11 percentage point lower bounce rate (25% vs 35%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 48 keywords (400% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026