loom.com vs usewhale.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| loom.com | usewhale.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 17.4M | 136.8K | loom.com |
| Bounce Rate | 49.7% | 35.8% | usewhale.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | loom.com |
| Domain Age | 28y 9m | 7y | loom.com |
loom.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while usewhale.io leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| loom.com | usewhale.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 17.4M | 136.8K | loom.com |
| MoM Change | +3% | -1% | loom.com |
| Avg. Session | 4m14s | 3m15s | loom.com |
| Pages / Visit | 3.2 | 4.8 | usewhale.io |
Growth Momentum · Insight
usewhale.io is losing traffic (-1%) despite 136.8K monthly visits. loom.com's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| loom.com | usewhale.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 76% | Direct 49% | |
| Bounce Rate | 49.7% | 35.8% | usewhale.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | loom.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 622%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
loom.com acquires users primarily through Direct (76%), while usewhale.io relies on Direct (49%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — loom.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while usewhale.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| loom.com | usewhale.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 28y 9m | 7y | loom.com |
| Registered | Dec 1997 | Aug 2019 | |
| Expires | Dec 2027 | Aug 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
loom.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| loom.com | usewhale.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #3.5K | #252.7K | loom.com |
| Category Rank | #10 | #1.1K | loom.com |
| PH Upvotes | 10 | — |
loom.com only
usewhale.io only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: loom.com could expand into Guatemala, Canada, while usewhale.io could target Philippines, Australia.
Key Takeaways
- •usewhale.io is losing traffic (-1%) despite 136.8K monthly visits. loom.com's +3% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •loom.com acquires users primarily through Direct (76%), while usewhale.io relies on Direct (49%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — loom.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while usewhale.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •loom.com receives 127.0x more monthly traffic than usewhale.io (17.4M vs 136.8K).
- •loom.com is growing (+3%) while usewhale.io is declining (-1%).
- •usewhale.io has a 14 percentage point lower bounce rate (36% vs 50%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 56 keywords (622% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026