lyssna.com vs maze.co
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| lyssna.com | maze.co | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 164.9K | 1.3M | maze.co |
| Bounce Rate | 44.1% | 54.0% | lyssna.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | maze.co |
| Domain Age | 23y 6m | 16y 1m | lyssna.com |
lyssna.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while maze.co leads in 2.
Growth Momentum
| lyssna.com | maze.co | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 164.9K | 1.3M | maze.co |
| MoM Change | -19% | +10% | maze.co |
| Avg. Session | 0m54s | 1m37s | maze.co |
| Pages / Visit | 2.5 | 2.6 | maze.co |
Growth Momentum · Insight
lyssna.com is losing traffic (-19%) despite 164.9K monthly visits. maze.co's +10% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| lyssna.com | maze.co | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 53% | Direct 66% | |
| Bounce Rate | 44.1% | 54.0% | lyssna.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 35 | maze.co |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 41%
| Keyword | Volume | lyssna.com | maze.co |
|---|---|---|---|
| maze user testing | 1.2K | #3 | #1 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
lyssna.com acquires users primarily through Direct (53%), while maze.co relies on Direct (66%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — maze.co's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while lyssna.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| lyssna.com | maze.co | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 23y 6m | 16y 1m | lyssna.com |
| Registered | Mar 2003 | Jul 2010 | |
| Expires | Mar 2034 | Jul 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
lyssna.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| lyssna.com | maze.co | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #253.3K | #44.2K | maze.co |
| Category Rank | #222 | #257 | lyssna.com |
lyssna.com only
maze.co only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: lyssna.com could expand into Brazil, Indonesia, while maze.co could target India, Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •lyssna.com is losing traffic (-19%) despite 164.9K monthly visits. maze.co's +10% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •lyssna.com acquires users primarily through Direct (53%), while maze.co relies on Direct (66%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — maze.co's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while lyssna.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •maze.co receives 8.2x more monthly traffic than lyssna.com (1.3M vs 164.9K).
- •maze.co is growing (+10%) while lyssna.com is declining (-19%).
- •maze.co keeps visitors significantly longer (1m37s avg session vs lyssna.com's 0m54s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •lyssna.com has a 10 percentage point lower bounce rate (44% vs 54%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026