maze.co vs mazehq.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| maze.co | mazehq.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.3M | 26.9K | maze.co |
| Bounce Rate | 54.0% | 35.2% | mazehq.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | maze.co |
| Domain Age | 16y 1m | 3y 9m | maze.co |
maze.co leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while mazehq.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| maze.co | mazehq.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.3M | 26.9K | maze.co |
| MoM Change | +10% | -3% | maze.co |
| Avg. Session | 1m37s | 0m43s | maze.co |
| Pages / Visit | 2.6 | 2.0 | maze.co |
Growth Momentum · Insight
mazehq.com is losing traffic (-3%) despite 26.9K monthly visits. maze.co's +10% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| maze.co | mazehq.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 66% | — | |
| Bounce Rate | 54.0% | 35.2% | mazehq.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | maze.co |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 364%
| Keyword | Volume | maze.co | mazehq.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| maze ai | 1.5K | #1 | #3 |
Business Maturity
| maze.co | mazehq.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 16y 1m | 3y 9m | maze.co |
| Registered | Jul 2010 | Nov 2022 | |
| Expires | Jul 2026 | Nov 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
maze.co has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| maze.co | mazehq.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #44.2K | #1.1M | maze.co |
| Category Rank | #257 | #1.1K | maze.co |
maze.co only
mazehq.com only
Market Position · Insight
mazehq.com is heavily concentrated in United States (47%), creating dependency risk on a single market. maze.co has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: maze.co could expand into India, Netherlands, Germany, while mazehq.com could target Canada, United Kingdom, Indonesia.
Key Takeaways
- •mazehq.com is losing traffic (-3%) despite 26.9K monthly visits. maze.co's +10% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •maze.co receives 50.3x more monthly traffic than mazehq.com (1.3M vs 26.9K).
- •maze.co is growing (+10%) while mazehq.com is declining (-3%).
- •maze.co keeps visitors significantly longer (1m37s avg session vs mazehq.com's 0m43s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •mazehq.com has a 19 percentage point lower bounce rate (35% vs 54%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 51 keywords (364% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026