me-qr.com vs qr.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| me-qr.com | qr.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 35.9M | 2.0M | me-qr.com |
| Bounce Rate | 55.7% | 52.8% | qr.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 5y 9m | 16y 4m | qr.io |
qr.io leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while me-qr.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| me-qr.com | qr.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 35.9M | 2.0M | me-qr.com |
| MoM Change | +6% | -8% | me-qr.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m31s | 1m36s | qr.io |
| Pages / Visit | 2.8 | 2.7 | me-qr.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
qr.io is losing traffic (-8%) despite 2.0M monthly visits. me-qr.com's +6% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| me-qr.com | qr.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 52% | Search 68% | |
| Bounce Rate | 55.7% | 52.8% | qr.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | me-qr.com | qr.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| make qr code | 21.2K | #8 | #5 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
me-qr.com acquires users primarily through Direct (52%), while qr.io relies on Search (68%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — me-qr.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while qr.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| me-qr.com | qr.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 5y 9m | 16y 4m | qr.io |
| Registered | Nov 2020 | Apr 2010 | |
| Expires | Nov 2026 | Apr 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
qr.io has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| me-qr.com | qr.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #1.5K | #29.4K | me-qr.com |
| Category Rank | #3 | #147 | me-qr.com |
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: me-qr.com could expand into United States, Brazil, Mexico, while qr.io could target Thailand, Indonesia, India.
Key Takeaways
- •qr.io is losing traffic (-8%) despite 2.0M monthly visits. me-qr.com's +6% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •me-qr.com acquires users primarily through Direct (52%), while qr.io relies on Search (68%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — me-qr.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while qr.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •me-qr.com receives 17.8x more monthly traffic than qr.io (35.9M vs 2.0M).
- •me-qr.com is growing (+6%) while qr.io is declining (-8%).
- •me-qr.com acquires traffic primarily through Direct (52%), while qr.io relies on Search (68%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •With only 0% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026