qr.io vs qrfy.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| qr.io | qrfy.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.0M | 1.5M | qr.io |
| Bounce Rate | 52.8% | 42.2% | qrfy.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 16y 4m | 20y 1m | qrfy.com |
qrfy.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while qr.io leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| qr.io | qrfy.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.0M | 1.5M | qr.io |
| MoM Change | -8% | +19% | qrfy.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m36s | 1m34s | qr.io |
| Pages / Visit | 2.7 | 2.9 | qrfy.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
qr.io is losing traffic (-8%) despite 2.0M monthly visits. qrfy.com's +19% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| qr.io | qrfy.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 68% | Search 65% | |
| Bounce Rate | 52.8% | 42.2% | qrfy.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | qr.io | qrfy.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| qr code generator | 1.9M | #5 | #8 |
| qr generator | 181.0K | #6 | #9 |
| scan code generator | 2.3K | #7 | #9 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
qr.io acquires users primarily through Search (68%), while qrfy.com relies on Search (65%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — qrfy.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while qr.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| qr.io | qrfy.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 16y 4m | 20y 1m | qrfy.com |
| Registered | Apr 2010 | Jul 2006 | |
| Expires | Apr 2027 | Jul 2033 |
Business Maturity · Insight
qrfy.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| qr.io | qrfy.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #29.4K | #37.7K | qr.io |
| Category Rank | #147 | #38 | qrfy.com |
qr.io only
qrfy.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: qr.io could expand into India, South Korea, Vietnam, while qrfy.com could target Brazil, Mexico, Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •qr.io is losing traffic (-8%) despite 2.0M monthly visits. qrfy.com's +19% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •qr.io acquires users primarily through Search (68%), while qrfy.com relies on Search (65%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — qrfy.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while qr.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •qr.io has 1.4x more traffic (2.0M vs 1.5M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •qrfy.com is growing (+19%) while qr.io is declining (-8%).
- •qrfy.com has a 11 percentage point lower bounce rate (42% vs 53%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •With only 0% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026