myqrcode.com vs qr.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| myqrcode.com | qr.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 447.9K | 2.0M | qr.io |
| Bounce Rate | 38.6% | 52.8% | myqrcode.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | myqrcode.com |
| Domain Age | 18y 5m | 16y 4m | myqrcode.com |
myqrcode.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while qr.io leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| myqrcode.com | qr.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 447.9K | 2.0M | qr.io |
| MoM Change | -5% | -8% | myqrcode.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m05s | 1m36s | qr.io |
| Pages / Visit | 3.9 | 2.7 | myqrcode.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
qr.io receives 4.5x more monthly traffic than myqrcode.com (2.0M vs 447.9K).
Acquisition Strategy
| myqrcode.com | qr.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 76% | Search 68% | |
| Bounce Rate | 38.6% | 52.8% | myqrcode.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 35 | 30 | myqrcode.com |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | myqrcode.com | qr.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| qr generator ai | 1.8K | #9 | #10 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
myqrcode.com acquires users primarily through Search (76%), while qr.io relies on Search (68%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — qr.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while myqrcode.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| myqrcode.com | qr.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 18y 5m | 16y 4m | myqrcode.com |
| Registered | Apr 2008 | Apr 2010 | |
| Expires | Apr 2027 | Apr 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
myqrcode.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| myqrcode.com | qr.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #93.3K | #29.4K | qr.io |
| Category Rank | #1.4K | #147 | qr.io |
myqrcode.com only
qr.io only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: myqrcode.com could expand into Brazil, Mexico, United Kingdom, while qr.io could target Indonesia, Canada, Colombia.
Key Takeaways
- •qr.io receives 4.5x more monthly traffic than myqrcode.com (2.0M vs 447.9K).
- •myqrcode.com acquires users primarily through Search (76%), while qr.io relies on Search (68%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — qr.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while myqrcode.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •qr.io receives 4.5x more monthly traffic than myqrcode.com (2.0M vs 447.9K).
- •myqrcode.com has a 14 percentage point lower bounce rate (39% vs 53%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •With only 0% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026