notice.co vs qz.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| notice.co | qz.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 339.4K | 1.8M | qz.com |
| Bounce Rate | 44.5% | 56.8% | notice.co |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | — | 27y 5m |
notice.co leads in 1 of 3 dimensions, while qz.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| notice.co | qz.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 339.4K | 1.8M | qz.com |
| MoM Change | -23% | +8% | qz.com |
| Avg. Session | 0m51s | 1m09s | qz.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.2 | 2.7 | qz.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
notice.co is losing traffic (-23%) despite 339.4K monthly visits. qz.com's +8% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| notice.co | qz.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 58% | Search 46% | |
| Bounce Rate | 44.5% | 56.8% | notice.co |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 30%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
notice.co acquires users primarily through Search (58%), while qz.com relies on Search (46%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — qz.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while notice.co's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| notice.co | qz.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | — | 27y 5m | |
| Registered | — | Mar 1999 | |
| Expires | — | Mar 2027 |
Market Position
| notice.co | qz.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #147.1K | #31.6K | qz.com |
| Category Rank | #677 | #536 | qz.com |
notice.co only
qz.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: notice.co could expand into Canada, Vietnam, while qz.com could target Switzerland, Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •notice.co is losing traffic (-23%) despite 339.4K monthly visits. qz.com's +8% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •notice.co acquires users primarily through Search (58%), while qz.com relies on Search (46%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — qz.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while notice.co's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •qz.com receives 5.4x more monthly traffic than notice.co (1.8M vs 339.4K).
- •qz.com is growing (+8%) while notice.co is declining (-23%).
- •notice.co has a 12 percentage point lower bounce rate (45% vs 57%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 14 keywords (30% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026