oxylabs.io vs scrape.do
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| oxylabs.io | scrape.do | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 525.8K | 163.6K | oxylabs.io |
| Bounce Rate | 38.2% | 39.3% | oxylabs.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 10y 9m | — |
oxylabs.io leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while scrape.do leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| oxylabs.io | scrape.do | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 525.8K | 163.6K | oxylabs.io |
| MoM Change | +13% | +2% | oxylabs.io |
| Avg. Session | 2m20s | 19m47s | scrape.do |
| Pages / Visit | 5.5 | 14.8 | scrape.do |
Growth Momentum · Insight
oxylabs.io is growing faster (+13%) but visitors stay 8.5x shorter (2m20s vs 19m47s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| oxylabs.io | scrape.do | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 48% | Search 40% | |
| Bounce Rate | 38.2% | 39.3% | oxylabs.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 140%
| Keyword | Volume | oxylabs.io | scrape.do |
|---|---|---|---|
| scraperapi | 25.3K | #3 | #6 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
oxylabs.io acquires users primarily through Search (48%), while scrape.do relies on Search (40%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — oxylabs.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while oxylabs.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| oxylabs.io | scrape.do | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 10y 9m | — | |
| Registered | Nov 2015 | — | |
| Expires | Nov 2029 | — |
Market Position
| oxylabs.io | scrape.do | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #72.0K | #126.6K | oxylabs.io |
| Category Rank | #1.3K | #1.0K | scrape.do |
oxylabs.io only
scrape.do only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: oxylabs.io could expand into Pakistan, Singapore, Uruguay, while scrape.do could target Lithuania, Vietnam, Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •oxylabs.io is growing +13% while scrape.do grows +2%. At current trajectory, oxylabs.io could close the traffic gap within 6 months.
- •oxylabs.io is growing faster (+13%) but visitors stay 8.5x shorter (2m20s vs 19m47s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •oxylabs.io acquires users primarily through Search (48%), while scrape.do relies on Search (40%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — oxylabs.io's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while oxylabs.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •oxylabs.io receives 3.2x more monthly traffic than scrape.do (525.8K vs 163.6K).
- •Both are growing, with oxylabs.io accelerating faster at +13% vs +2%.
- •scrape.do keeps visitors significantly longer (19m47s avg session vs oxylabs.io's 2m20s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026