scrape.do vs scrapingbee.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| scrape.do | scrapingbee.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 163.6K | 215.2K | scrapingbee.com |
| Bounce Rate | 39.3% | 42.2% | scrape.do |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | — | 6y 11m |
scrape.do leads in 1 of 3 dimensions, while scrapingbee.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| scrape.do | scrapingbee.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 163.6K | 215.2K | scrapingbee.com |
| MoM Change | +2% | -6% | scrape.do |
| Avg. Session | 19m47s | 1m30s | scrape.do |
| Pages / Visit | 14.8 | 2.3 | scrape.do |
Growth Momentum · Insight
scrapingbee.com is losing traffic (-6%) despite 215.2K monthly visits. scrape.do's +2% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| scrape.do | scrapingbee.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 40% | Search 46% | |
| Bounce Rate | 39.3% | 42.2% | scrape.do |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 1900%
| Keyword | Volume | scrape.do | scrapingbee.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| scrapingbee | 21.6K | #3 | #1 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
scrape.do acquires users primarily through Search (40%), while scrapingbee.com relies on Search (46%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — scrapingbee.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while scrapingbee.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| scrape.do | scrapingbee.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | — | 6y 11m | |
| Registered | — | Sep 2019 | |
| Expires | — | Sep 2027 |
Market Position
| scrape.do | scrapingbee.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #126.6K | #211.9K | scrape.do |
| Category Rank | #1.0K | #3.5K | scrape.do |
scrape.do only
scrapingbee.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: scrape.do could expand into France, Lithuania, United Kingdom, while scrapingbee.com could target Pakistan, Singapore, Uruguay.
Key Takeaways
- •scrapingbee.com is losing traffic (-6%) despite 215.2K monthly visits. scrape.do's +2% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •scrape.do acquires users primarily through Search (40%), while scrapingbee.com relies on Search (46%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — scrapingbee.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while scrapingbee.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •scrapingbee.com has 1.3x more traffic (215.2K vs 163.6K), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •scrape.do is growing (+2%) while scrapingbee.com is declining (-6%).
- •scrape.do keeps visitors significantly longer (19m47s avg session vs scrapingbee.com's 1m30s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 57 keywords (1900% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026