remote.co vs remote.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| remote.co | remote.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.3M | 1.5M | remote.com |
| Bounce Rate | 37.5% | 43.4% | remote.co |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 16y 1m | 34y 2m | remote.com |
remote.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while remote.co leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| remote.co | remote.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.3M | 1.5M | remote.com |
| MoM Change | -14% | +14% | remote.com |
| Avg. Session | 2m16s | 2m44s | remote.com |
| Pages / Visit | 5.5 | 5.0 | remote.co |
Growth Momentum · Insight
remote.co is losing traffic (-14%) despite 1.3M monthly visits. remote.com's +14% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| remote.co | remote.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 49% | Direct 53% | |
| Bounce Rate | 37.5% | 43.4% | remote.co |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | remote.co | remote.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| remote.co | 7.5K | #1 | #6 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
remote.co acquires users primarily through Direct (49%), while remote.com relies on Direct (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — remote.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while remote.co's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| remote.co | remote.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 16y 1m | 34y 2m | remote.com |
| Registered | Jul 2010 | Jun 1992 | |
| Expires | Jul 2026 | Jun 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
remote.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| remote.co | remote.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #32.4K | #31.2K | remote.com |
| Category Rank | #223 | #605 | remote.co |
remote.co only
remote.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: remote.co could expand into United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, while remote.com could target Philippines, Indonesia, Pakistan.
Key Takeaways
- •remote.co is losing traffic (-14%) despite 1.3M monthly visits. remote.com's +14% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •remote.co acquires users primarily through Direct (49%), while remote.com relies on Direct (53%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — remote.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while remote.co's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •remote.com is growing (+14%) while remote.co is declining (-14%).
- •With only 0% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
- •remote.com has a 18-year head start in the market.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026