remote.co vs remotejobs.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| remote.co | remotejobs.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.3M | 37.7K | remote.co |
| Bounce Rate | 37.5% | 45.6% | remote.co |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 16y 1m | 25y 1m | remotejobs.com |
remote.co leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while remotejobs.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| remote.co | remotejobs.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.3M | 37.7K | remote.co |
| MoM Change | -14% | -26% | remote.co |
| Avg. Session | 2m16s | 0m30s | remote.co |
| Pages / Visit | 5.5 | 2.4 | remote.co |
Growth Momentum · Insight
remote.co receives 34.2x more monthly traffic than remotejobs.com (1.3M vs 37.7K).
Acquisition Strategy
| remote.co | remotejobs.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 49% | Search 61% | |
| Bounce Rate | 37.5% | 45.6% | remote.co |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 216%
| Keyword | Volume | remote.co | remotejobs.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| remote jobs | 329.8K | #5 | #1 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
remote.co acquires users primarily through Direct (49%), while remotejobs.com relies on Search (61%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — remote.co's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while remotejobs.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| remote.co | remotejobs.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 16y 1m | 25y 1m | remotejobs.com |
| Registered | Jul 2010 | Aug 2001 | |
| Expires | Jul 2026 | Aug 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
remotejobs.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| remote.co | remotejobs.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #32.4K | #793.3K | remote.co |
| Category Rank | #223 | #3.1K | remote.co |
remote.co only
remotejobs.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: remote.co could expand into Nigeria, United Kingdom, while remotejobs.com could target Indonesia, Pakistan.
Key Takeaways
- •remote.co receives 34.2x more monthly traffic than remotejobs.com (1.3M vs 37.7K).
- •remote.co acquires users primarily through Direct (49%), while remotejobs.com relies on Search (61%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — remote.co's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while remotejobs.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •remote.co receives 34.2x more monthly traffic than remotejobs.com (1.3M vs 37.7K).
- •remote.co keeps visitors significantly longer (2m16s avg session vs remotejobs.com's 0m30s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •remote.co has a 8 percentage point lower bounce rate (38% vs 46%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •remote.co acquires traffic primarily through Direct (49%), while remotejobs.com relies on Search (61%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026