rottentomatoes.com vs screenrant.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| rottentomatoes.com | screenrant.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 105.8M | 45.7M | rottentomatoes.com |
| Bounce Rate | 50.0% | 69.2% | rottentomatoes.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 27y 3m | 22y 9m | rottentomatoes.com |
rottentomatoes.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while screenrant.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| rottentomatoes.com | screenrant.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 105.8M | 45.7M | rottentomatoes.com |
| MoM Change | +20% | -5% | rottentomatoes.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m32s | 1m07s | rottentomatoes.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.3 | 1.7 | rottentomatoes.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
screenrant.com is losing traffic (-5%) despite 45.7M monthly visits. rottentomatoes.com's +20% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| rottentomatoes.com | screenrant.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 69% | Search 47% | |
| Bounce Rate | 50.0% | 69.2% | rottentomatoes.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 22%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
rottentomatoes.com acquires users primarily through Search (69%), while screenrant.com relies on Search (47%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — screenrant.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while rottentomatoes.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| rottentomatoes.com | screenrant.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 27y 3m | 22y 9m | rottentomatoes.com |
| Registered | May 1999 | Dec 2003 | |
| Expires | May 2027 | Dec 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
rottentomatoes.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| rottentomatoes.com | screenrant.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #471 | #1.5K | rottentomatoes.com |
| Category Rank | #17 | #27 | rottentomatoes.com |
Key Takeaways
- •screenrant.com is losing traffic (-5%) despite 45.7M monthly visits. rottentomatoes.com's +20% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •rottentomatoes.com acquires users primarily through Search (69%), while screenrant.com relies on Search (47%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — screenrant.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while rottentomatoes.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •rottentomatoes.com receives 2.3x more monthly traffic than screenrant.com (105.8M vs 45.7M).
- •rottentomatoes.com is growing (+20%) while screenrant.com is declining (-5%).
- •rottentomatoes.com has a 19 percentage point lower bounce rate (50% vs 69%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 11 keywords (22% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026