seon.io vs sumsub.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| seon.io | sumsub.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 214.7K | 2.0M | sumsub.com |
| Bounce Rate | 39.8% | 47.1% | seon.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 11y 5m | 11y 4m | seon.io |
seon.io leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while sumsub.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| seon.io | sumsub.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 214.7K | 2.0M | sumsub.com |
| MoM Change | +3% | +1% | seon.io |
| Avg. Session | 0m43s | 3m19s | sumsub.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.4 | 4.4 | sumsub.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
sumsub.com receives 9.2x more monthly traffic than seon.io (2.0M vs 214.7K).
Acquisition Strategy
| seon.io | sumsub.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 45% | Direct 69% | |
| Bounce Rate | 39.8% | 47.1% | seon.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 233%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
seon.io acquires users primarily through Direct (45%), while sumsub.com relies on Direct (69%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — sumsub.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while seon.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| seon.io | sumsub.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 11y 5m | 11y 4m | seon.io |
| Registered | Mar 2015 | May 2015 | |
| Expires | Mar 2030 | May 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
seon.io has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| seon.io | sumsub.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #204.8K | #24.9K | sumsub.com |
| Category Rank | #775 | #207 | sumsub.com |
seon.io only
sumsub.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: seon.io could expand into Germany, Taiwan, Russia, while sumsub.com could target Vietnam, Spain, India.
Key Takeaways
- •sumsub.com receives 9.2x more monthly traffic than seon.io (2.0M vs 214.7K).
- •seon.io acquires users primarily through Direct (45%), while sumsub.com relies on Direct (69%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — sumsub.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while seon.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •sumsub.com receives 9.2x more monthly traffic than seon.io (2.0M vs 214.7K).
- •sumsub.com keeps visitors significantly longer (3m19s avg session vs seon.io's 0m43s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •They share 42 keywords (233% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026