seranking.com vs spyfu.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| seranking.com | spyfu.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.2M | 391.9K | seranking.com |
| Bounce Rate | 40.0% | 35.6% | spyfu.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 15y 11m | 20y 6m | spyfu.com |
spyfu.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while seranking.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| seranking.com | spyfu.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 1.2M | 391.9K | seranking.com |
| MoM Change | -2% | -2% | — |
| Avg. Session | 4m29s | 3m16s | seranking.com |
| Pages / Visit | 5.3 | 5.6 | spyfu.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
seranking.com receives 3.1x more monthly traffic than spyfu.com (1.2M vs 391.9K).
Acquisition Strategy
| seranking.com | spyfu.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 42% | Direct 61% | |
| Bounce Rate | 40.0% | 35.6% | spyfu.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 161%
| Keyword | Volume | seranking.com | spyfu.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| website traffic checker | 227.1K | #6 | #7 |
| traffic checker | 148.6K | #7 | #9 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
seranking.com acquires users primarily through Direct (42%), while spyfu.com relies on Direct (61%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — spyfu.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while seranking.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| seranking.com | spyfu.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 15y 11m | 20y 6m | spyfu.com |
| Registered | Sep 2010 | Feb 2006 | |
| Expires | Sep 2027 | Feb 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
spyfu.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| seranking.com | spyfu.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #37.2K | #96.5K | seranking.com |
| Category Rank | #2.7K | #86 | spyfu.com |
| PH Upvotes | 7 | 10 | spyfu.com |
seranking.com only
spyfu.com only
Market Position · Insight
spyfu.com is heavily concentrated in United States (43%), creating dependency risk on a single market. seranking.com has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: seranking.com could expand into Pakistan, United Arab Emirates, while spyfu.com could target Netherlands, Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •seranking.com receives 3.1x more monthly traffic than spyfu.com (1.2M vs 391.9K).
- •seranking.com acquires users primarily through Direct (42%), while spyfu.com relies on Direct (61%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — spyfu.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while seranking.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •seranking.com receives 3.1x more monthly traffic than spyfu.com (1.2M vs 391.9K).
- •They share 37 keywords (161% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
- •spyfu.com depends on a single country for 43% of traffic, while seranking.com is spread across more markets — lower geographic risk.
- •spyfu.com has a 5-year head start in the market.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026