36kr.com vs quasa.io
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| 36kr.com | quasa.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.7M | 325.2K | 36kr.com |
| Bounce Rate | 57.5% | 45.9% | quasa.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 15y 11m | 8y 12m | 36kr.com |
36kr.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while quasa.io leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| 36kr.com | quasa.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 2.7M | 325.2K | 36kr.com |
| MoM Change | +9% | +12% | quasa.io |
| Avg. Session | 2m27s | 0m26s | 36kr.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.4 | 1.5 | 36kr.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
36kr.com receives 8.4x more monthly traffic than quasa.io (2.7M vs 325.2K).
Acquisition Strategy
| 36kr.com | quasa.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 44% | Search 63% | |
| Bounce Rate | 57.5% | 45.9% | quasa.io |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 5%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
36kr.com acquires users primarily through Direct (44%), while quasa.io relies on Search (63%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — 36kr.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while quasa.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| 36kr.com | quasa.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 15y 11m | 8y 12m | 36kr.com |
| Registered | Oct 2010 | Sep 2017 | |
| Expires | Sep 2026 | Sep 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
36kr.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| 36kr.com | quasa.io | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #24.3K | #177.2K | 36kr.com |
| Category Rank | — | #272 |
36kr.com only
quasa.io only
Market Position · Insight
36kr.com is heavily concentrated in China (74%), creating dependency risk on a single market. quasa.io has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: 36kr.com could expand into Ukraine, Russia, Uzbekistan, while quasa.io could target China, Hong Kong SAR China, Singapore.
Key Takeaways
- •36kr.com receives 8.4x more monthly traffic than quasa.io (2.7M vs 325.2K).
- •36kr.com acquires users primarily through Direct (44%), while quasa.io relies on Search (63%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — 36kr.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while quasa.io's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •36kr.com receives 8.4x more monthly traffic than quasa.io (2.7M vs 325.2K).
- •36kr.com keeps visitors significantly longer (2m27s avg session vs quasa.io's 0m26s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •quasa.io has a 12 percentage point lower bounce rate (46% vs 58%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •36kr.com acquires traffic primarily through Direct (44%), while quasa.io relies on Search (63%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026