amazon.science vs aws.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
amazon.science| amazon.science | aws.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 319.0K | 1.1M | aws.com |
| Bounce Rate | 49.6% | 41.3% | aws.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 11y 7m | 31y 7m | aws.com |
aws.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while amazon.science leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| amazon.science | aws.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 319.0K | 1.1M | aws.com |
| MoM Change | -6% | +28% | aws.com |
| Avg. Session | 0m41s | 3m16s | aws.com |
| Pages / Visit | 1.8 | 3.7 | aws.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
amazon.science is losing traffic (-6%) despite 319.0K monthly visits. aws.com's +28% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| amazon.science | aws.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Search 43% | Direct 60% | |
| Bounce Rate | 49.6% | 41.3% | aws.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 22%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
amazon.science acquires users primarily through Search (43%), while aws.com relies on Direct (60%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — aws.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while amazon.science's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| amazon.science | aws.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 11y 7m | 31y 7m | aws.com |
| Registered | Feb 2015 | Jan 1995 | |
| Expires | Feb 2027 | Jan 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
aws.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| amazon.science | aws.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #168.6K | #44.5K | aws.com |
| Category Rank | #90 | #30 | aws.com |
| PH Upvotes | 126 | 59 | amazon.science |
amazon.science only
aws.com only
Market Position · Insight
amazon.science is heavily concentrated in United States (47%), creating dependency risk on a single market. aws.com has a more diversified audience.
Each has untapped markets the other serves: amazon.science could expand into Brazil, China, while aws.com could target Germany, United Kingdom.
Key Takeaways
- •amazon.science is losing traffic (-6%) despite 319.0K monthly visits. aws.com's +28% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •amazon.science acquires users primarily through Search (43%), while aws.com relies on Direct (60%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — aws.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while amazon.science's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •aws.com receives 3.6x more monthly traffic than amazon.science (1.1M vs 319.0K).
- •aws.com is growing (+28%) while amazon.science is declining (-6%).
- •aws.com keeps visitors significantly longer (3m16s avg session vs amazon.science's 0m41s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •aws.com has a 8 percentage point lower bounce rate (41% vs 50%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026