arcgis.com vs epidemap
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| arcgis.com | epidemap | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 28.0M | — | |
| Bounce Rate | 47.0% | 0.0% | epidemap |
| Est. MRR | — | $0 | |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 4 | arcgis.com |
| Domain Age | 27y 3m | 3m | arcgis.com |
arcgis.com leads in 2 of 3 dimensions, while epidemap leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| arcgis.com | epidemap | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 28.0M | — | |
| MoM Change | +4% | -100% | arcgis.com |
| Avg. Session | 3m57s | 0m00s | arcgis.com |
| Pages / Visit | 5.7 | 0.0 | arcgis.com |
Acquisition Strategy
| arcgis.com | epidemap | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 49% | — | |
| Bounce Rate | 47.0% | 0.0% | epidemap |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 4 | arcgis.com |
arcgis.com
Search 25%Direct 49%Social 3%Referral 21%Email 2%
SearchDirectSocialReferralPaidEmail
27
3
1
arcgis.com OnlySharedepidemap Only
Keyword Overlap Rate: 10%
Business Maturity
Revenue estimates are derived from public data sources. Actual figures may differ.
| arcgis.com | epidemap | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Est. MRR | — | $0 | |
| Domain Age | 27y 3m | 3m | arcgis.com |
| Registered | Jun 1999 | May 2026 | |
| Expires | Jun 2026 | May 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
epidemap has reached $0 MRR in 0 years while arcgis.com shows no public revenue data after 27 years — suggesting different monetization maturity or disclosure strategies.
Market Position
| arcgis.com | epidemap | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #1.4K | #15.8M | arcgis.com |
| Category Rank | #21 | — |
Key Takeaways
- •arcgis.com is growing (+4%) while epidemap is declining (-100%).
- •arcgis.com keeps visitors significantly longer (3m57s avg session vs epidemap's 0m00s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •epidemap has a 47 percentage point lower bounce rate (0% vs 47%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
- •They share 3 keywords (10% overlap), indicating direct search competition.
- •arcgis.com has 7.5x more ranking keywords (30 vs 4), indicating broader SEO footprint.
- •arcgis.com depends on a single country for 61% of traffic, while epidemap is spread across more markets — lower geographic risk.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026