arcgis.com vs cdc.gov
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| arcgis.com | cdc.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 28.0M | 18.9M | arcgis.com |
| Bounce Rate | 47.0% | 65.2% | arcgis.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 27y 3m | 28y 11m | cdc.gov |
arcgis.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while cdc.gov leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| arcgis.com | cdc.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 28.0M | 18.9M | arcgis.com |
| MoM Change | +4% | +20% | cdc.gov |
| Avg. Session | 3m57s | 1m43s | arcgis.com |
| Pages / Visit | 5.7 | 2.1 | arcgis.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
cdc.gov is growing faster (+20%) but visitors stay 2.3x shorter (1m43s vs 3m57s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| arcgis.com | cdc.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 49% | Search 62% | |
| Bounce Rate | 47.0% | 65.2% | arcgis.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 7%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
arcgis.com acquires users primarily through Direct (49%), while cdc.gov relies on Search (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — arcgis.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while cdc.gov's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| arcgis.com | cdc.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 27y 3m | 28y 11m | cdc.gov |
| Registered | Jun 1999 | Oct 1997 | |
| Expires | Jun 2026 | Aug 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
cdc.gov has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| arcgis.com | cdc.gov | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #1.4K | #3.7K | arcgis.com |
| Category Rank | #21 | #18 | cdc.gov |
arcgis.com only
cdc.gov only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: arcgis.com could expand into Philippines, India, Mexico, while cdc.gov could target United Kingdom, Japan, Colombia.
Key Takeaways
- •cdc.gov is growing +20% while arcgis.com grows +4%. At current trajectory, cdc.gov could close the traffic gap within 3 months.
- •cdc.gov is growing faster (+20%) but visitors stay 2.3x shorter (1m43s vs 3m57s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •arcgis.com acquires users primarily through Direct (49%), while cdc.gov relies on Search (62%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — arcgis.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while cdc.gov's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •arcgis.com has 1.5x more traffic (28.0M vs 18.9M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •Both are growing, with cdc.gov accelerating faster at +20% vs +4%.
- •arcgis.com keeps visitors significantly longer (3m57s avg session vs cdc.gov's 1m43s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026