arcgis.com vs esri.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| arcgis.com | esri.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 28.0M | 2.3M | arcgis.com |
| Bounce Rate | 47.0% | 45.0% | esri.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 27y 3m | 36y 4m | esri.com |
esri.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while arcgis.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| arcgis.com | esri.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 28.0M | 2.3M | arcgis.com |
| MoM Change | +4% | +10% | esri.com |
| Avg. Session | 3m57s | 3m43s | arcgis.com |
| Pages / Visit | 5.7 | 3.4 | arcgis.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
esri.com is growing +10% while arcgis.com grows +4%. At current trajectory, esri.com could close the traffic gap within 29 months.
Acquisition Strategy
| arcgis.com | esri.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 49% | Search 42% | |
| Bounce Rate | 47.0% | 45.0% | esri.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 0%
| Keyword | Volume | arcgis.com | esri.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| network diagram | 14.1K | #10 | #9 |
| raster | 13.8K | #2 | #5 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
arcgis.com acquires users primarily through Direct (49%), while esri.com relies on Search (42%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — arcgis.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while esri.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| arcgis.com | esri.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 27y 3m | 36y 4m | esri.com |
| Registered | Jun 1999 | Apr 1990 | |
| Expires | Jun 2026 | Apr 2028 |
Business Maturity · Insight
esri.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| arcgis.com | esri.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #1.4K | #24.7K | arcgis.com |
| Category Rank | #21 | #12 | esri.com |
arcgis.com only
esri.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: arcgis.com could expand into Australia, Indonesia, while esri.com could target Japan, Colombia.
Key Takeaways
- •esri.com is growing +10% while arcgis.com grows +4%. At current trajectory, esri.com could close the traffic gap within 29 months.
- •arcgis.com acquires users primarily through Direct (49%), while esri.com relies on Search (42%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — arcgis.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while esri.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •arcgis.com receives 12.0x more monthly traffic than esri.com (28.0M vs 2.3M).
- •Both are growing, with esri.com accelerating faster at +10% vs +4%.
- •arcgis.com acquires traffic primarily through Direct (49%), while esri.com relies on Search (42%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
- •With only 0% keyword overlap, they target largely different search audiences.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026