businessinsider.com vs fortune.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| businessinsider.com | fortune.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 42.1M | 21.7M | businessinsider.com |
| Bounce Rate | 56.8% | 52.8% | fortune.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 28y 6m | 32y 3m | fortune.com |
fortune.com leads in 2 of 4 dimensions, while businessinsider.com leads in 1.
Growth Momentum
| businessinsider.com | fortune.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 42.1M | 21.7M | businessinsider.com |
| MoM Change | -11% | +1% | fortune.com |
| Avg. Session | 1m04s | 0m47s | businessinsider.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.1 | 1.5 | businessinsider.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
fortune.com is growing faster (+1%) but visitors stay 1.3x shorter (0m47s vs 1m04s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
Acquisition Strategy
| businessinsider.com | fortune.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 45% | Search 43% | |
| Bounce Rate | 56.8% | 52.8% | fortune.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 20%
| Keyword | Volume | businessinsider.com | fortune.com |
|---|---|---|---|
| palantir neurodivergent fellowship | 4.0K | #6 | #3 |
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
businessinsider.com acquires users primarily through Direct (45%), while fortune.com relies on Search (43%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — businessinsider.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while fortune.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| businessinsider.com | fortune.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 28y 6m | 32y 3m | fortune.com |
| Registered | Mar 1998 | Jun 1994 | |
| Expires | Sep 2028 | May 2027 |
Business Maturity · Insight
fortune.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| businessinsider.com | fortune.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #1.5K | #3.8K | businessinsider.com |
| Category Rank | #31 | #58 | businessinsider.com |
businessinsider.com only
fortune.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: businessinsider.com could expand into Australia, while fortune.com could target Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •businessinsider.com is losing traffic (-11%) despite 42.1M monthly visits. fortune.com's +1% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •fortune.com is growing faster (+1%) but visitors stay 1.3x shorter (0m47s vs 1m04s). Rapid growth with declining engagement depth often signals lower-quality traffic or shallow product usage.
- •businessinsider.com acquires users primarily through Direct (45%), while fortune.com relies on Search (43%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — businessinsider.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while fortune.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •businessinsider.com has 1.9x more traffic (42.1M vs 21.7M), though both operate at comparable scale.
- •fortune.com is growing (+1%) while businessinsider.com is declining (-11%).
- •businessinsider.com acquires traffic primarily through Direct (45%), while fortune.com relies on Search (43%) — fundamentally different acquisition strategies.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026