cnn.com vs tudn.com
Market traction comparison · Updated Jul 2026
| cnn.com | tudn.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 351.8M | 18.2M | cnn.com |
| Bounce Rate | 61.2% | 73.2% | cnn.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Domain Age | 32y 11m | 17y 9m | cnn.com |
cnn.com leads in 3 of 4 dimensions, while tudn.com leads in 0.
Growth Momentum
| cnn.com | tudn.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Visits | 351.8M | 18.2M | cnn.com |
| MoM Change | +1% | -15% | cnn.com |
| Avg. Session | 2m34s | 1m04s | cnn.com |
| Pages / Visit | 2.0 | 1.5 | cnn.com |
Growth Momentum · Insight
tudn.com is losing traffic (-15%) despite 18.2M monthly visits. cnn.com's +1% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
Acquisition Strategy
| cnn.com | tudn.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Channel | Direct 69% | Search 79% | |
| Bounce Rate | 61.2% | 73.2% | cnn.com |
| SEO & Keywords | 30 | 30 | — |
Keyword Overlap Rate: 9%
Acquisition Strategy · Insight
cnn.com acquires users primarily through Direct (69%), while tudn.com relies on Search (79%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cnn.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while tudn.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
Business Maturity
| cnn.com | tudn.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Age | 32y 11m | 17y 9m | cnn.com |
| Registered | Sep 1993 | Nov 2008 | |
| Expires | Sep 2027 | Nov 2026 |
Business Maturity · Insight
cnn.com has been in the market for over a decade, indicating established presence.
Market Position
| cnn.com | tudn.com | Leads | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Rank | #153 | #4.6K | cnn.com |
| Category Rank | #5 | #3 | tudn.com |
cnn.com only
tudn.com only
Market Position · Insight
Each has untapped markets the other serves: cnn.com could expand into Mexico, Spain, Colombia, while tudn.com could target Canada, United Kingdom, Germany.
Key Takeaways
- •tudn.com is losing traffic (-15%) despite 18.2M monthly visits. cnn.com's +1% growth puts it on a trajectory to overtake.
- •cnn.com acquires users primarily through Direct (69%), while tudn.com relies on Search (79%). This reflects fundamentally different go-to-market strategies — cnn.com's higher direct traffic suggests stronger brand recognition or product-led growth, while tudn.com's search reliance means growth is more scalable but more vulnerable to algorithm changes.
- •cnn.com receives 19.4x more monthly traffic than tudn.com (351.8M vs 18.2M).
- •cnn.com is growing (+1%) while tudn.com is declining (-15%).
- •cnn.com keeps visitors significantly longer (2m34s avg session vs tudn.com's 1m04s), suggesting deeper product engagement or stickier content.
- •cnn.com has a 12 percentage point lower bounce rate (61% vs 73%), indicating better landing page relevance or more targeted traffic.
You've seen the gap. Now steal the playbook.
A Growth Teardown reverse-engineers exactly how each product grows — traffic sources, backlink strategy, keyword gaps, and scored action items you can copy this week.
Related Comparisons
Report based on data from July 2026